Why Is Tomasz Adamek Being Shut Out By The Major American TV Networks?

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Mr. Ryan
    Guest
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Mar 2004
    • 23437
    • 1,301
    • 1,090
    • 29,664

    #21
    Originally posted by Pirao
    That's a good point, but the talk of Adamek fighting Grant has been on for a while, we don't know if he tried to get other opponent. If he did then yeah, shame on HBO.
    HBO wanted a rematch between Adamek and Arreola, why? Adamek clearly won the fight and it wasn't in dispute. It's because HBO wanted Arreola to win so it would spark interest in Arreola again.

    Adamek knew he wasn't getting on HBO, so you keep busy. Honestly, if Adamek was with Al Haymon it wouldn't even be an issue. Arreola is with Haymon and HBO seems to only do business with him.

    Librado Andrade vs. Robert Stieglitz on HBO anyone?

    Comment

    • TheGreatA
      Undisputed Champion
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Dec 2007
      • 14143
      • 633
      • 271
      • 21,863

      #22
      Originally posted by Mikey Palmice
      That's with the betting favorite, not the network. The network had the date reserved for Arreola, they are in love with him. He could fight Jameel McCline, Chazz Witherspoon, Travis Walker, whoever on that network.

      Adamek fights comparable opposition and it's shown on GoFightLive.

      Without Arreola, Adamek wouldn't have been fighting on HBO. That's why the talk of a rematch was there.
      I wouldn't call it being an "opponent" though if you're favoured to win by most.

      The network likes Arreola, because he's a draw, win or lose. Adamek was only the "opponent" in the sense that Arreola brought most of the viewers, but it was by no means a fight that was set up for Arreola to win. If Adamek ever fights a Klitschko brother or David Haye, the major networks will surely show the fight. There just aren't too many fights that will bring as much interest in an Adamek fight.

      What fight would you suggest that HBO should showcase Adamek in? Against Chambers? Sam Peter?

      Comment

      • jrosales13
        undisputed champion
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Sep 2008
        • 32632
        • 738
        • 763
        • 40,023

        #23
        I don't understand it, I don't get it either. I wish somebody could explain it to me. And, it is not in his next fight. It has been happening for the past couple years now.

        Comment

        • Crazylegs77
          null and void
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Jan 2008
          • 13101
          • 445
          • 296
          • 21,573

          #24
          Originally posted by TheGreatA
          He didn't get shunned when he fought Arreola. It has to do with the potential opposition. No one really cares to see a top 10 contender beat up on a 40+ year old. It won't be a major fight, just a showcase.
          cough Chad Dawson cough

          One of HBOs superstars, ring a bell?

          Comment

          • TheGreatA
            Undisputed Champion
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Dec 2007
            • 14143
            • 633
            • 271
            • 21,863

            #25
            Originally posted by Crazylegs77
            cough Chad Dawson cough

            One of HBOs superstars, ring a bell?
            Those 40 year olds were top 3 ranked in the division. Michael Grant, Evander Holyfield and Roy Jones are not. All of the three should be retired.

            Comment

            • jrosales13
              undisputed champion
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Sep 2008
              • 32632
              • 738
              • 763
              • 40,023

              #26
              Originally posted by Mikey Palmice
              HBO wanted a rematch between Adamek and Arreola, why? Adamek clearly won the fight and it wasn't in dispute. It's because HBO wanted Arreola to win so it would spark interest in Arreola again.

              Adamek knew he wasn't getting on HBO, so you keep busy. Honestly, if Adamek was with Al Haymon it wouldn't even be an issue. Arreola is with Haymon and HBO seems to only do business with him.

              Librado Andrade vs. Robert Stieglitz on HBO anyone?
              Exactly right, nobody should be fooled by why really that fight was on HBO. It was cuz of Arreola connection with Al Haymon.

              You can put Arreola in there with McCline but you can't put Adamek in there with Grant? And, nobody really see's a problem here?

              Comment

              • Mr. Ryan
                Guest
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Mar 2004
                • 23437
                • 1,301
                • 1,090
                • 29,664

                #27
                Originally posted by TheGreatA
                I wouldn't call it being an "opponent" though if you're favoured to win by most.

                The network likes Arreola, because he's a draw, win or lose. Adamek was only the "opponent" in the sense that Arreola brought most of the viewers, but it was by no means a fight that was set up for Arreola to win. If Adamek ever fights a Klitschko brother or David Haye, the major networks will surely show the fight. There just aren't too many fights that will bring as much interest in an Adamek fight.

                What fight would you suggest that HBO should showcase Adamek in? Against Chambers? Sam Peter?
                In network talk, you are definitely an opponent if you are being brought there with hopes that you bring a credible fight but lose to their favorite fighter. The betting public might have made Adamek a favorite (probably spurred on by reports that Arreola wasn't training for the fight), but HBO wanted Arreola.

                The networks like him because he is a draw, yes. They like him even more because Al Haymon is his manager though.

                I doubt HBO showcases Adamek but Chambers, Peter, even a Tony Thompson would be good showcases. The Klitschkos would be a definite in since HBO loves them and Haye has to work out something with a US network.

                Comment

                • B.U.R.N.E.R
                  ~NSB Legend 2005-2015~
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Feb 2010
                  • 30186
                  • 1,344
                  • 400
                  • 47,475

                  #28
                  Last I checked ESPN is an American major network.

                  Last edited by B.U.R.N.E.R; 05-25-2010, 05:05 PM.

                  Comment

                  • jrosales13
                    undisputed champion
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Sep 2008
                    • 32632
                    • 738
                    • 763
                    • 40,023

                    #29
                    Originally posted by TheGreatA
                    Those 40 year olds were top 3 ranked in the division. Michael Grant, Evander Holyfield and Roy Jones are not. All of the three should be retired.
                    I am not going to really say that Adamek and his next fight belongs on a major network.

                    But, Adamek-Cunningham II did. And, HBO didn't want to touch it. The first fight was a very good fight, the rematch was necessary and HBO didn't want to put money for that fight? But, they will for P-Will-Wright?

                    Adamek-Johnson belonged on a major network. And, HBO didn't want to touch it But, the rather show Diaz-Malignaggi two fighters that were coming off a lost at the time? Or Arreola-McCline? Or Berto against a Mexican cop belong?

                    I mean something is wrong that you can not find a P4P type level fighter, who has an exciting style, who does somewhat of a fan base in Chicago and New Jersey, and you can't find him on a major network? Something is wrong when you can watch all these other recycled fighters and not Adamek.

                    Comment

                    • TheGreatA
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                      • Dec 2007
                      • 14143
                      • 633
                      • 271
                      • 21,863

                      #30
                      To be honest I don't know too much about the business side of boxing but he has gotten enough coverage from what I've seen. It's also more difficult for a foreign boxer to make their way into the American market.

                      I think he's in a situation now where there aren't too many potential contenders to take on and is keeping busy with a fight against a relatively easy opponent. Not criticizing that, but I won't criticize anyone for not being interested in the fight either.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP