Comments Thread For: Froch Balks at Sweden, Will Fight Abraham in America

[TEDetc]

ok. your saying to me im not a fan of boxing! lol, iv been to more fights than you have had hot dinners. you can talk as much as you want, it dont change the fact that froch is wank, and no he cant box. watch the dirrell fight! look at all those wild hooks he lands on thin air.

"been to more fights than you have had hot dinners"

Is this kid serious? 1) How would you even know that? 2) The last time I heard that **** was about 14 years ago, when I was 10.

How is Froch wank? Lets take a look at his last 4 opponents:

Kessler, Dirrell, Taylor, Pascal. He won 3 of those and lost 1. Albeit the Dirrell fight might be controversial but then again, so is the Kessler one so it evens out.

Tell me how is Froch wank? Please explain, you think because he's not a flashy technician against a slick, constantly moving Dirrell that he's not a good boxer? He has great power, a strong jab, excellent pressure and a great chin. Froch wank? Get the **** out of here. Stop being a hater and show Froch the respect he deserves, even if you hate the guy he fights the best possible opponents out there and gives it his all, you call yourself a fan of boxing yet call someone like that "wank" ? Bull****.

[bboy80]

"

How is Froch wank? Lets take a look at his last 4 opponents:

Kessler, Dirrell, Taylor, Pascal. He won 3 of those and lost 1. Albeit the Dirrell fight might be controversial but then again, so is the Kessler one so it evens out.

Tell me how is Froch wank? Please explain, you think because he's not a flashy technician against a slick, constantly moving Dirrell that he's not a good boxer? He has great power, a strong jab, excellent pressure and a great chin. Froch wank? Get the **** out of here. Stop being a hater and show Froch the respect he deserves, even if you hate the guy he fights the best possible opponents out there and gives it his all, you call yourself a fan of boxing yet call someone like that "wank" ? Bull****.

co sign.....

[shade darkar]

"been to more fights than you have had hot dinners"

Is this kid serious? 1) How would you even know that? 2) The last time I heard that **** was about 14 years ago, when I was 10.

How is Froch wank? Lets take a look at his last 4 opponents:

Kessler, Dirrell, Taylor, Pascal. He won 3 of those and lost 1. Albeit the Dirrell fight might be controversial but then again, so is the Kessler one so it evens out.

Tell me how is Froch wank? Please explain, you think because he's not a flashy technician against a slick, constantly moving Dirrell that he's not a good boxer? He has great power, a strong jab, excellent pressure and a great chin. Froch wank? Get the **** out of here. Stop being a hater and show Froch the respect he deserves, even if you hate the guy he fights the best possible opponents out there and gives it his all, you call yourself a fan of boxing yet call someone like that "wank" ? Bull****.

theres no controversy over the kessler fight unless you are from nottingham or you are blind. dirrell ran all night and STILL outboxed froch. froch landed 1 good punch the whole fight! apart from that those wild hooks he threw did alot of damage to the air. what was the score at the time of the KO in the taylor fight? he was losing on all 3 cards, why? because he got outboxed again. you see a trend here?


strong jab?! hahahahahahahaha funny ****! arm jabs more like. the geezer has NO SKILL whatsoever. half decent chin maybe, but thats it!

[bboy80]

strong jab?! hahahahahahahaha funny ****! arm jabs more like. the geezer has NO SKILL whatsoever. half decent chin maybe, but thats it!

If he beats A.A would you change your mind ? obv you dont think he would or will.. but if he did?

[shade darkar]

If he beats A.A would you change your mind ? obv you dont think he would or will.. but if he did?

i highly doubt ill be changing my mind on froch. the geezer chats like hes the best thing since sliced bread, yet has no skill at all. even the tv networks know it hence the reason he is always on internet streams!

[bboy80]

i highly doubt ill be changing my mind on froch. the geezer chats like hes the best thing since sliced bread, yet has no skill at all. even the tv networks know it hence the reason he is always on internet streams!

fair enough, he does chat proper ****e i know but we dont really have much to shout about at the monent, hayes being a gaylord, Khans still young and green

Hattons fat, mitchell just got ****d, and we aint winning the world cup either..

[TEDetc]

theres no controversy over the kessler fight unless you are from nottingham or you are blind. dirrell ran all night and STILL outboxed froch. froch landed 1 good punch the whole fight! apart from that those wild hooks he threw did alot of damage to the air. what was the score at the time of the KO in the taylor fight? he was losing on all 3 cards, why? because he got outboxed again. you see a trend here?


strong jab?! hahahahahahahaha funny ****! arm jabs more like. the geezer has NO SKILL whatsoever. half decent chin maybe, but thats it!

Then why did alot of the ring side press and american commentators have Froch winning? Along with the british ones? Me and 4 friends all had Froch winning by 115-113. I rewatched the fight and came out with the exact same score, if you really think a score of 117-111 was it? In favour of Kessler wasn't controversial then you're blind.

How can you even bring up Taylor? Froch knocked him out, simple as that and it wasn't some sort of lucky one punch knockout, Froch chased him down and beat him into submission.

You're clearly a Froch hater which is why I'm saying you're not a fan of boxing if you can't atleast respect Froch as a boxer. Not liking the guys personality and not respecting his skill as a boxer are two completely different things, you seem to be stuck in hating Froch so much you can't give him any sort of credit.

i highly doubt ill be changing my mind on froch. the geezer chats like hes the best thing since sliced bread, yet has no skill at all. even the tv networks know it hence the reason he is always on internet streams!

And there it is. "I DON'T LIKE FROCH BECAUSE OF HIS PERSONALITY SO HES A BAD BOXER"

Show me a british boxer in the past 10 years who has fought the calliber of opponents Froch has consecutively, go on, I'm waiting.

**** haters, they're not fans of boxing they're little bitches who wank off their "favourite" fighters and slander anyone they don't like, this isn't a popularity contenst, it's boxing.

[shade darkar]

Then why did alot of the ring side press and american commentators have Froch winning? Along with the british ones? Me and 4 friends all had Froch winning by 115-113. I rewatched the fight and came out with the exact same score, if you really think a score of 117-111 was it? In favour of Kessler wasn't controversial then you're blind.

How can you even bring up Taylor? Froch knocked him out, simple as that and it wasn't some sort of lucky one punch knockout, Froch chased him down and beat him into submission.

You're clearly a Froch hater which is why I'm saying you're not a fan of boxing if you can't atleast respect Froch as a boxer. Not liking the guys personality and not respecting his skill as a boxer are two completely different things, you seem to be stuck in hating Froch so much you can't give him any sort of credit.



And there it is. "I DON'T LIKE FROCH BECAUSE OF HIS PERSONALITY SO HES A BAD BOXER"

Show me a british boxer in the past 10 years who has fought the calliber of opponents Froch has consecutively, go on, I'm waiting.

**** haters, they're not fans of boxing they're little bitches who wank off their "favourite" fighters and slander anyone they don't like, this isn't a popularity contenst, it's boxing.

think what you want. i couldnt care less. froch is wank and you moaning because i dont rate him isnt going to change anything.

lets have a little reminder on why i dont rate him...

[TEDetc]

think what you want. i couldnt care less. froch is wank and you moaning because i dont rate him isnt going to change anything.

lets have a little reminder on why i dont rate him...

I'm not moaning, merely stating you're not a fan of boxing. You don't rate him because you hate him, it's pretty simple, lol saying @ you don't rate him because you think Dirrell got robbed, yeah that's Froch's fault and not the officials fault isn't it?

You absolute ****ing dolt.

P.S, Wins over Taylor, Pascal and Dirrell + a 12 round war against Kessler pretty much proves he isn't wank.

[English puncher]

theres no controversy over the kessler fight unless you are from nottingham or you are blind. dirrell ran all night and STILL outboxed froch. froch landed 1 good punch the whole fight! apart from that those wild hooks he threw did alot of damage to the air. what was the score at the time of the KO in the taylor fight? he was losing on all 3 cards, why? because he got outboxed again. you see a trend here?


strong jab?! hahahahahahahaha funny ****! arm jabs more like. the geezer has NO SKILL whatsoever. half decent chin maybe, but thats it!

Gatti always got outboxed!! does that mean you think he is **** too?