Landis = Mayweather and Armstrong = Pacquiao

**ModernTalking** · 05-21-2010, 12:54 PM

It's nothing new, *****s getting owned left and right everyday.

**thatnickuh** · 05-21-2010, 12:56 PM

So when has Lance Armstrong ever refused to subject himself to random blood testing?

**V.WEBB** · 05-21-2010, 12:59 PM

Originally posted by ModernTalking

It's nothing new, *****s getting owned left and right everyday.

**Boxingholic** · 05-21-2010, 01:15 PM

Originally posted by COACH-WEBB

Owned as usual !!!

**fightfan_79** · 05-21-2010, 01:51 PM

Originally posted by thatnickuh

So when has Lance Armstrong ever refused to subject himself to random blood testing?

Never.....I just found that the article itself was pretty funny due to the fact that Landis was "accusing" Armstrong of doping...and the IOC and WADA asking for "concrete evidence" of the accusation.....and that tests that Armstrong has been taking (random or not although I would assume random...they are the WADA afterall) have never been positive....same as Pacquiao....(although the NSAC tests are definately not on the level of WADA or USADA)

You are free to interpret the article as you see fit....I found it humorous....and two certain fighters in a soap opera immediately came to mind.

**fightfan_79** · 05-21-2010, 01:52 PM

Originally posted by COACH-WEBB

Webb....Moderntalk is starting to become quite the comedian....he should audition for Def Jam or Comic View

**thatnickuh** · 05-21-2010, 01:59 PM

Originally posted by fightfan_79

Never.....I just found that the article itself was pretty funny due to the fact that Landis was "accusing" Armstrong of doping...and the IOC and WADA asking for "concrete evidence" of the accusation.....and that tests that Armstrong has been taking (random or not although I would assume random...they are the WADA afterall) have never been positive....same as Pacquiao....(although the NSAC tests are definately not on the level of WADA or USADA)

You are free to interpret the article as you see fit....I found it humorous....and two certain fighters in a soap opera immediately came to mind.

I just don't see your comparisons as being accurate, not in the least. If Armstrong was running around making excuses for not agreeing to random blood testing, he wouldn't be allowed to compete in his sport. Armstrong has b een subjected to the most stringent testing in professional sports, and has never failed a test. That holds a lot more weight than Pacquiao using the fact that he's never failed a NSCA drug test. Your Mayweather Landis comparison is just as invalid.

**fightfan_79** · 05-21-2010, 02:48 PM

Originally posted by thatnickuh

I just don't see your comparisons as being accurate, not in the least. If Armstrong was running around making excuses for not agreeing to random blood testing, he wouldn't be allowed to compete in his sport. Armstrong has b een subjected to the most stringent testing in professional sports, and has never failed a test. That holds a lot more weight than Pacquiao using the fact that he's never failed a NSCA drug test. Your Mayweather Landis comparison is just as invalid.

Well Mr. Nickuh.......this thread was created for humor....again...take it how you want it....

I guess *****s and Tards really don't have a great sense of humor....

**thatnickuh** · 05-21-2010, 02:58 PM

Originally posted by fightfan_79

I guess *****s and Tards really don't have a great sense of humor....

Maybe it's you who doesn't have a great sense of humor? I don't see a lot of posts where people are laughing. I hear crickets.

Landis = Mayweather and Armstrong = Pacquiao