GOOD READ: There Certainly Wasn't Any Floyd Mayweather In Muhammad Ali
Collapse
-
this article is not relevant all the way through (it's pretty biased too)
we're in a different era and context now, steroids use is a very concerning problem today while it was not the case in Ali's era
as for his willingness to fight the best, people are a bit severe towards Mayweather, as he was willing to fight the best sometimes but was denied the opportunity
prime Mosley
Tszyu
he did fight undefeated Corrales, undefeated Hatton, Judah, Hernandez, Castillo, aging Mosley, aging De la Hoya, Manfredy, Gatti, Augustus, Corley, Chavez,...
It is when he went up to 147 that Mayweather's opposition started to lack the top names (Margarito, Cotto,...)
of course you can't compare his overall record to the one of Ali, but I don't think all the blame should be put on Mayweather, he's no coward
give Floyd a ****ing break...Last edited by Tiozzo; 06-07-2010, 07:11 AM.Comment
-
I have no idea how some people come to the conclusion that Floyd should be rated that high in the superfeather classI think Floyd is the #2 Jr. Light all time behind Arguello; he might have beaten Alexis but AA gets the nod because his comp was just a lot better. That's ATG enough when considering the best of that class (i.e. Chocolate, Nelson, Serrano...deep class). Floyd invites the wild reactions he gets, but that doesn't mean his career can't also be objectively measured.
tell me : why should he be ranked that high at SFW ??? I just don't see it
beat a lot of bums to start his career (like everybody does), earned a shot at the champion, beat Hernandez to win the WBC title, then beat Manfredy, made 8 successful defenses against ordinary to good competition , beat Chavez, Corrales before going up to 135 lbs
that's it
he was obviously on top of his game at 130, he looked unbeatable, he had power that he lost going up in weight, but he hasn't beaten many great fighters at 130
so how can you rate him ahead of Elorde, Kid Chocolate and Nelson ??? this is a mystery to me, I want to hear why
I would rate him no higher than #4 all-time SFWLast edited by Tiozzo; 06-07-2010, 01:02 AM.Comment
Comment