Pure Boxers Have Always Ruled Boxing

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • M.I.C.
    Undisputed Champion
    • Mar 2008
    • 3344
    • 193
    • 0
    • 9,683

    #51
    Originally posted by jrosales13
    That is what I am saying. A lot of people like to **** on the extremist Pac fans. But, the the extremist Floyd fans are just AS bad.
    This thread is not about Pac but we know you really want it to be, keep trying you may get us all talking about PED's in another couple of post or so.

    Comment

    • 2501
      upinurgirlsguts
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Oct 2007
      • 20211
      • 902
      • 49
      • 28,237

      #52
      so is this ANOTHER floyd fan trying to change the definition of a term? I mean seriously? First, we had floyd fans trying to change the definition of "fan base", then floyd fans trying to change what a "decade" was and now we got this fool trying to change the definition of "pure boxer". This is too much hahah

      Comment

      • HyperUppercut
        Banned
        • Apr 2010
        • 274
        • 28
        • 18
        • 367

        #53
        Originally posted by M.I.C.
        Do you know that no one in the world fits perfectly into any 1 category? I dont know how many times I got to mention the applicaton of all around boxing skills and abilities constitutes my definition of Pure boxing. Adding your god given gifts on top of pure boxing skill does not mean your all of a sudden not a pure boxer. You seem to think one guy is not a boxer cause he holds his hands low, or because he hooks more than jabs. Roy's footwork is that of a pure boxer, I know the art when I see it.
        this guy is hilarious. Now he is stating that the definition of Pure Boxer that he is referring to is his own made up one.

        Comment

        • jrosales13
          undisputed champion
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Sep 2008
          • 32632
          • 738
          • 763
          • 40,023

          #54
          Originally posted by M.I.C.
          Do you know that no one in the world fits perfectly into any 1 category? I dont know how many times I got to mention the applicaton of all around boxing skills and abilities constitutes my definition of Pure boxing. Adding your god given gifts on top of pure boxing skill does not mean your all of a sudden not a pure boxer. You seem to think one guy is not a boxer cause he holds his hands low, or because he hooks more than jabs. Roy's footwork is that of a pure boxer, I know the art when I see it.
          All around boxing skills is not considered a pure boxer though M.I.C. All around boxing skills a complete fighter or versatile. But, not pure boxer.

          Ivan Calderon is a pure boxer. But, he is not a slugger, if he comes forward he might not do good he doesn't have that kind of style or maybe skill set to come forward. But, he is a pure boxer.

          JMM would you consider him a pure boxer? Or Barrera a pure boxer? Ricardo Lopez?

          Comment

          • HyperUppercut
            Banned
            • Apr 2010
            • 274
            • 28
            • 18
            • 367

            #55
            Originally posted by jrosales13
            All around boxing skills is not considered a pure boxer though M.I.C. All around boxing skills a complete fighter or versatile. But, not pure boxer.

            Ivan Calderon is a pure boxer. But, he is not a slugger, if he comes forward he might not do good he doesn't have that kind of style or maybe skill set to come forward. But, he is a pure boxer.

            JMM would you consider him a pure boxer? Or Barrera a pure boxer? Ricardo Lopez?
            I still want to know if this guy considers Sergio Martinez a pure boxer. He is butt hurt right now because he just realized he doesn't understand what a pure boxer is. He is probably googling it right now.

            Comment

            • jrosales13
              undisputed champion
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Sep 2008
              • 32632
              • 738
              • 763
              • 40,023

              #56
              Originally posted by M.I.C.
              This thread is not about Pac but we know you really want it to be, keep trying you may get us all talking about PED's in another couple of post or so.
              We don't have to talk about Pac. We can talk about any fighter you want and we can break it down too. I don't brag about my knowledge. But, right now I am very confident that my boxing knowledge is over yours. So we can break down any fighter or fight you want. From any era.

              Don't let my avi fool you now.
              Last edited by jrosales13; 05-18-2010, 03:14 PM.

              Comment

              • jrosales13
                undisputed champion
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Sep 2008
                • 32632
                • 738
                • 763
                • 40,023

                #57
                Originally posted by Makavelli
                he said Roy was a pure boxer too
                Dude is confused.

                Comment

                • M.I.C.
                  Undisputed Champion
                  • Mar 2008
                  • 3344
                  • 193
                  • 0
                  • 9,683

                  #58
                  Originally posted by HyperUppercut
                  this guy is hilarious. Now he is stating that the definition of Pure Boxer that he is referring to is his own made up one.
                  Its my thread which makes it my point of view does it not? But interesting how the only concept of pure boxing throughout all these post have been made by me. I just find it ironic how little any of you truly know about boxing. So much so that when truth of our beloved sport is presented to you, you are unable to process it.

                  Comment

                  • 2501
                    upinurgirlsguts
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Oct 2007
                    • 20211
                    • 902
                    • 49
                    • 28,237

                    #59
                    Originally posted by M.I.C.
                    Its my thread which makes it my point of view, but interesting how the only concept of pure boxing throughout all these post have been made by me. I just find it ironic how little any of you truly know about boxing. So much so that when truth of our beloved sport is presented to you, you are unable to process it.
                    is Barrera a pure boxer then? going by your standards

                    Comment

                    • jrosales13
                      undisputed champion
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Sep 2008
                      • 32632
                      • 738
                      • 763
                      • 40,023

                      #60
                      Originally posted by HyperUppercut
                      I still want to know if this guy considers Sergio Martinez a pure boxer. He is butt hurt right now because he just realized he doesn't understand what a pure boxer is. He is probably googling it right now.
                      And, I hope he answers then. And, I am not even trying to flame the guy. But, he doesn't know what he is talking about.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP