Is There Any Proof That Pacquiao Has Been Taking Anything Illegal?

[Bring It On]

Okay. That's great man.

By the way, what's "SARM" an acronym for?

I'm waiting. I attempted to do some research on it, found nothing. I'm beginning to believe you fabricated the drug in attempt to spoil someones argument.

Selective androgen receptor modulators

[thatnickuh]

They will undergo the same exact testing but the problem is? while Floyd is mentally prepared for it we know Pac is not and this will give Floyd an upper hand psychologically and he knows it! Mental game baby. Pac doesn't like the idea of taking his blood hours before his fight.

Like I continue to say over and over, if Pacquiao is ****** enough to think that he will be weakened days after taking a blood test then that's a personal problem. That's not a legit excuse to duck the tests. Anybody can say that, why do you think that's a legit excuse? And why are you talking hours before the fight? Neither Mayweather or Mosley gave blood hours before the fight, it was days. Plus Mayweather compromised and gave Pacquiao a 14 day cut-off and he still walked away. Explain that, since you feel the need to play Pacquiao's defense attorney.

[maguirre]

I mean one guy is bigger, has longer reach, faster, slicker, yet he's still demanding a level playing with a smaller guy with no history of using peds.

And when I talk about fans being robbed of good fights, I am talking about the Mosley/May fight. They were clearly both affected by the blood draining. We saw a Mosley that gassed out prematurely and a Floyd that was slower. Sure, he was throwing punches with speed, but they were few and far in between. That, *****s, is what Pac fans saw why they were saying Pac could beat Floyd the next day of the fight.

These *****s actually think that only Pac could be affected. It's possible that it may be worse for Floyd. Pac could easily set his mind to it if forced. And he is not as old as Mosley.

As a fan who wants to see the fight, Pac agreeing to the tests would be welcome. Whatever it takes. Bow down to the Mayweathers, drink their piss for all I care.

[whirlwind]

Like I continue to say over and over, if Pacquiao is ****** enough to think that he will be weakened days after taking a blood test then that's a personal problem. That's not a legit excuse to duck the tests. Anybody can say that, why do you think that's a legit excuse? And why are you talking hours before the fight? Neither Mayweather or Mosley gave blood hours before the fight, it was days. Plus Mayweather compromised and gave Pacquiao a 14 day cut-off and he still walked away. Explain that, since you feel the need to play Pacquiao's defense attorney.

Pac team gave them the proposal of 24 days cut off after the failed 30 days but Floyd still insisted with no cut off as what he did to Mosley. Then they issued a press release saying they offered them 14 days cut off but that was after the meeting is over.

[Counter Punch]

There is only high speculation, su****ion, and probability.

Hence, the request for OST.

If there was proof there would be no need for further testing because there would be nothing to prove.

[V.WEBB]

I mean one guy is bigger, has longer reach, faster, slicker, yet he's still demanding a level playing with a smaller guy with no history of using peds.

And when I talk about fans being robbed of good fights, I am talking about the Mosley/May fight. They were clearly both affected by the blood draining. We saw a Mosley that gassed out prematurely and a Floyd that was slower. Sure, he was throwing punches with speed, but they were few and far in between. That, *****s, is what Pac fans saw why they were saying Pac could beat Floyd the next day of the fight.

These *****s actually think that only Pac could be affected. It's possible that it may be worse for Floyd. Pac could easily set his mind to it if forced. And he is not as old as Mosley.

As a fan who wants to see the fight, Pac agreeing to the tests would be welcome. Whatever it takes. Bow down to the Mayweathers, drink their piss for all I care.

[Bee Keepz]

Discussion:

...post-test (right image) shows significant FACIAL HAIR GROWTH from pre-test (left image).

[V.WEBB]

Pac team gave them the proposal of 24 days cut off after the failed 30 days but Floyd still insisted with no cut off as what he did to Mosley. Then they issued a press release saying they offered them 14 days cut off but that was after the meeting is over.

That is because that is the actual protocol of those administering the tests, USADA. It wasn't merely Floyd's stance, he was following the USADA. And please don't talk about that meeting, because the judge came out and stated what ACTUALLY happened. Arum went straight the media and did the lying.

Do you guys actually pay attention to what actually happened?

[whirlwind]

Discussion:

...post-test (right image) shows significant FACIAL HAIR GROWTH from pre-test (left image).

Don't look at the hair. Look at the skull in the proportion of his body! If you still insist your flawed comparison then my advice is you to buy a pair of spectacles.

[The Negro]

Athletes would only be tested once upon their enterance in the league with no testing to follow unless the athlete failed the initial drug test. That's how the concept "innocent until proven guilty" works right?

No.

I don't get where you are going with the idea that there wouldn't be follow up testing after your first test, whether you passed or not. I don't know how you thought that one up.

The point is, you can't call someone guilty with no proof at all. Someone is considered clean until it is proven otherwise.

Pacquiao has never tested positive for anything. There is no proof he has taken anything illegal, therefore it's not right to say that he is guilty of taking illegal substances. It's quite simple.

Try spin that to suit your agenda again, kid.