Is There Any Proof That Pacquiao Has Been Taking Anything Illegal?

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Bee Keepz
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Jan 2010
    • 1872
    • 67
    • 0
    • 8,119

    #111
    He maintained his power from flyweight to welterweight.

    Comment

    • fcastro1
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Sep 2008
      • 3770
      • 89
      • 7
      • 10,064

      #112
      Originally posted by whirlwind
      If they can agree to meet at middle in their last proposed cut off days. We will see this fight. If Floyd still insist his way then we are sorry.
      If floyd dont agree to a middle cut of date like 14 days or less then we know that he is trying to mess with pac mentally or physically. people that say it gives pac an avenue for cheating is reaching big time. why would pac even consider taking something that close to the fight while the world is watching him closely. If floyd dont want to compromise then he dont want the fight.

      Comment

      • V.WEBB
        CBVM
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Dec 2009
        • 14327
        • 621
        • 174
        • 21,453

        #113
        Originally posted by Deevel916
        That was never his stance until it was time for him to face Pac. Had that always been his stance, I can totally understand.
        Why does that matter WHEN it was his stance?

        Comment

        • V.WEBB
          CBVM
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Dec 2009
          • 14327
          • 621
          • 174
          • 21,453

          #114
          Originally posted by fcastro1
          If floyd dont agree to a middle cut of date like 14 days or less then we know that he is trying to mess with pac mentally or physically. people that say it gives pac an avenue for cheating is reaching big time. why would pac even consider taking something that close to the fight while the world is watching him closely. If floyd dont want to compromise then he dont want the fight.
          Who walked away again and had another fight done a day later?

          Comment

          • thatnickuh
            Banned
            • Dec 2008
            • 851
            • 42
            • 5
            • 919

            #115
            Originally posted by American Pride
            I don't think has ever tested positive for any banned substance in all of his fights. Has he?

            Btw, if you're going to make a claim of someone taking something illegal then you should have something to back it up. Innocent until proven guilty and all that.

            You need to prove something actually took place rather than it didn't.
            Innocent until proven guilty is the standard in our courts of law, not professional sports. If that standard applied in pro sports then there would either no random drug testing in the 1st place. Athletes would only be tested once upon their enterance in the league with no testing to follow unless the athlete failed the initial drug test. That's how the concept "innocent until proven guilty" works right? How about you tell your employer that since you passed your inital drug test upon being hired, that you won't subject yourself to anymore testing because you passed the initial test. Sounds ****** right? I know.

            No pro athlete is considered innocent until proven guilty regarding PEDs, that's why they are constantly tested. Mayweather is simply trying to negotiate stricter testing, and his reason is because he knows that there are ways around the current system. Innocent until proven guilty has absolutely nothing to do with this. He will be undergoing the same exact testing as Pacquiao. You people continually ignore that.

            This is common sense but it seems as if you people don't have any. Seriously, these arguments are just plain dumb. A lot of you should be embarrassed.

            Comment

            • fcastro1
              Undisputed Champion
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Sep 2008
              • 3770
              • 89
              • 7
              • 10,064

              #116
              Originally posted by COACH-WEBB
              Who walked away again and had another fight done a day later?
              new negotiations. both had their stances in the first one, and from pacs camp they are trying to give a little for this one, i dont see that coming from floyds side.

              Comment

              • HyperUppercut
                Banned
                • Apr 2010
                • 274
                • 28
                • 18
                • 367

                #117
                Originally posted by mesher
                Floyd has proof in ONE fight, where he actually didn't fight anything like he usually does, he wasn't as athletic and his legs weren't there.
                so his legs weren't there because he stood toe to toe with a fighter and whooped his ass???? yall are some sad people.

                Comment

                • The Negro
                  Contender
                  • May 2010
                  • 134
                  • 8
                  • 0
                  • 6,171

                  #118
                  Is there any proof Pacquiao has been taking anything illegal?

                  A one word answer will suffice.

                  Comment

                  • maguirre
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • May 2010
                    • 7037
                    • 543
                    • 196
                    • 11,164

                    #119
                    Originally posted by Deevel916
                    At the end of the day, its the whole issue of OSDT that roadblocked the fight from happening. Had it not been an issue, the fight would have taken place on March 13th.
                    At the end of the day it is sad. Sad that it has to come to this when we all know at the back of our minds that this is unnecessary. We boxing fans are being robbed of good fights just because of one man's accusation.

                    Here we have a bunch of hypocrites defending the indefensible.

                    Comment

                    • HyperUppercut
                      Banned
                      • Apr 2010
                      • 274
                      • 28
                      • 18
                      • 367

                      #120
                      Originally posted by Cgarcia
                      At the end of the day it is sad. Sad that it has to come to this when we all know at the back of our minds that this is unnecessary. We boxing fans are being robbed of good fights just because of one man's accusation.

                      Here we have a bunch of hypocrites defending the indefensible.
                      we are also being robbed because of one mans refusal to "EASILY" prove himself clean.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP