Stop being a *****! Everyone else is fighting w/o OSTs.

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • thatnickuh
    Banned
    • Dec 2008
    • 851
    • 42
    • 5
    • 919

    #91
    Originally posted by pistol whip
    I don't give a *** about pac's feelings what i'm saying is if Floyds camp's intentions were to protect their fighter then why the smear campaign,manipulation, etc,etc?
    You obviously care about poor little Pacquiao's feelings, hence you continuing to harp on why people chose to publicly accuse him. Why do you care why? It's irrelevant. I doubt that the Mayweather's have ever been accused of being the classiest family on earth, this is them. They believe that Pacquiao is probably dirty and that's what they said. They're obviously not politcally correct.

    Originally posted by pistol whip
    Why the need to bully him into it???
    You continuing to ask these weak irrelevant questions is what makes it look like you care more about Pacquiao's hurt feelings than you do about whether he's actually dirty or not. Pacquiao's feelings or pride being hurt because of accusations that he's dirty, is not a legit excuse to refuse more stringent drug testing in my opinion as a boxing fan. To me, that's a weak convenient excuse to dodge the more stringent drug testing. I don't believe that Pacquiao's skin is that thin or that he's that insecure. The year is 2010. All pro athletes should understand that they are under su****ion of using PEDs. That's why these pro sports leagues have drug testing in the 1st place.

    And for the last time, stop trying to make this a principle issue. If Pacquiao was refusing to fight Mayweather because of the PED accusations from his camp, then there would have been no need to negotiate in the 1st place and no need to negotiate anytime in the future. The fact that Pacquiao sat down and not only negotiated with Mayweather but attempted to reach a compromise on the drug testing, makes that your "principle" point moot. What part of that are you having trouble with?


    Originally posted by pistol whip
    Pac and his feelings can go *** themselves for all I care and if he does decide to take the test I'm all for that too as long as the fight happens so don't think i'm here trying to defend pac. i want the fight and have no intrest in which side is right and which side is wrong.
    Yet, all I've seen you do is defend Pacquiao and make excuses for he shouldn't just take the tests and make the fight.

    Comment

    • IMDAZED
      Fair but Firm
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • May 2006
      • 42644
      • 1,134
      • 1,770
      • 67,152

      #92
      Originally posted by pistol whip
      Don't go suking eachothers ****s just yet, like I said before pee flows into a cup diffrently in cali and new york than it does in vegas??
      Who the **** cares? No testing caught Shane. And that same testing that caught Toney (the first time because the fight got moved up or he wouldn't have been caught), didn't catch him the other 90+ times he fought.

      Comment

      • pistol whip
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Aug 2008
        • 8645
        • 255
        • 4
        • 15,040

        #93
        Originally posted by thatnickuh
        You obviously care about poor little Pacquiao's feelings, hence you continuing to harp on why people chose to publicly accuse him. Why do you care why? It's irrelevant. I doubt that the Mayweather's have ever been accused of being the classiest family on earth, this is them. They believe that Pacquiao is probably dirty and that's what they said. They're obviously not politcally correct.

        You continuing to ask these weak irrelevant questions is what makes it look like you care more about Pacquiao's hurt feelings than you do about whether he's actually dirty or not. Pacquiao's feelings or pride being hurt because of accusations that he's dirty, is not a legit excuse to refuse more stringent drug testing in my opinion as a boxing fan. To me, that's a weak convenient excuse to dodge the more stringent drug testing. I don't believe that Pacquiao's skin is that thin or that he's that insecure. The year is 2010. All pro athletes should understand that they are under su****ion of using PEDs. That's why these pro sports leagues have drug testing in the 1st place.

        And for the last time, stop trying to make this a principle issue. If Pacquiao was refusing to fight Mayweather because of the PED accusations from his camp, then there would have been no need to negotiate in the 1st place and no need to negotiate anytime in the future. The fact that Pacquiao sat down and not only negotiated with Mayweather but attempted to reach a compromise on the drug testing, makes that your "principle" point moot. What part of that are you having trouble with?


        Yet, all I've seen you do is defend Pacquiao and make excuses for he shouldn't just take the tests and make the fight.

        Lol it isn't about pac feeling it's about Floyds intentions numbnuts. If he just wants to protect himself why all the ***ing accusations thats a good enough reason byitself. *** man your reading comprehension is that of a 3rd grader.

        Comment

        • baracuda
          Banned
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Mar 2009
          • 10779
          • 259
          • 569
          • 11,470

          #94
          for real....if you cant handle the rules everyone else is following, get the **** out of the sport!.......

          Comment

          • pistol whip
            Undisputed Champion
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Aug 2008
            • 8645
            • 255
            • 4
            • 15,040

            #95
            Originally posted by IMDAZED
            Who the **** cares? No testing caught Shane. And that same testing that caught Toney (the first time because the fight got moved up or he wouldn't have been caught), didn't catch him the other 90+ times he fought.
            So are you saying testing is futile no matter what is used?


            *** make up your mind and stop overexagerating to make some useless point. It's highly unlikely that Tony used steroids for "all" 90 of his fights. Thats a childish argument.

            Comment

            • IMDAZED
              Fair but Firm
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • May 2006
              • 42644
              • 1,134
              • 1,770
              • 67,152

              #96
              Originally posted by pistol whip
              So are you saying testing is futile no matter what is used?


              *** make up your mind and stop overexagerating to make some useless point. It's highly unlikely that Tony used steroids for "all" 90 of his fights. Thats a childish argument.
              No, I'm saying that if better testing exists then we should use it. The **** is wrong with you? And second, what's even more childish is to think Toney used it twice...just the two times he was caught. Grow up.

              Comment

              • V.WEBB
                CBVM
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • Dec 2009
                • 14329
                • 621
                • 174
                • 21,453

                #97
                Originally posted by baracuda
                for real....if you cant handle the rules everyone else is following, get the **** out of the sport!.......
                What rules are you speaking of?

                Comment

                • thatnickuh
                  Banned
                  • Dec 2008
                  • 851
                  • 42
                  • 5
                  • 919

                  #98
                  Originally posted by pistol whip
                  Lol it isn't about pac feeling it's about Floyds intentions numbnuts. If he just wants to protect himself why all the ***ing accusations thats a good enough reason byitself. *** man your reading comprehension is that of a 3rd grader.
                  You just said that him wanting to protect himself is reason enough, so why are you continuing to focus on Mayweather's intentions instead of trying to understand the real reason why Pacquiao has refused? Mayweather's intentions are obvious to anyonme with a brain, he wan ts to take further steps than the one's in place to make sure that Pacquiao is clean when he enters the ring to fight him. Doesn't take a genius to figure that out. Your little insults mean nothing. I don't have to insult you, your lack of intelligence is glaring on it's own.

                  Comment

                  • tredh
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Apr 2007
                    • 5949
                    • 204
                    • 3
                    • 12,544

                    #99
                    I guess if jumping off bridges was the new thing to do I guess everybody who didn't do it should stop being bitches!?!?!?!?

                    Comment

                    • Chuckguy
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                      • Jun 2008
                      • 13927
                      • 345
                      • 183
                      • 58,389

                      #100
                      AHh yes one of GT-R's daily Trolling threads

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP