Originally posted by No Ceilings
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Why does Floyd have to win 7 titles to be great?
Collapse
-
Originally posted by STRUGG View Postwho was lineal at 140......when PAC beat hatton?.............almost doesnt count.........shane almost KOED floyd...........cintron almost won against williams.................
Comment
-
Manny have a better resume than Floyd, plus in teh situations he fought sometimes was ridiculous.
Manny have 4 lineal titles.
The Cotto win alone ****s on anything on Floyds resume. And please spare me the Cotto was shot when Manny faced him.
Floyd needs to do some serious catch up to get to Pacquiao in a ATG basis
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by YummGum View PostManny have a better resume than Floyd, plus in teh situations he fought sometimes was ridiculous.
Manny have 4 lineal titles.
The Cotto win alone ****s on anything on Floyds resume. And please spare me the Cotto was shot when Manny faced him.
Floyd needs to do some serious catch up to get to Pacquiao in a ATG basis
Gimme a break man.
Comment
-
Originally posted by pasawayako View PostFloyd is great but He needs to win 7 division championship belt to equal pac in an atg rankings. Right now he's well behind pac on the atg rankings.
What looks better on your resume? 7 belts and your best win was against MAB or 6 official belts, your best win was against a prime Pac, and you never lost or had a draw?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by California Love View PostNo, he doesn't need to win 7 belts. Pac is a paper champ at 135. Floyd can be ahead of Manny with 6 official belts.
What looks better on your resume? 7 belts and your best win was against MAB or 6 official belts, your best win was against a prime Pac, and you never lost or had a draw?
pacquiao = 7 weight division champion, 4 lineal belts
mayweather = 5 weight division champion, 3 lineal belts
lol.
Comment
Comment