Manny Pacquaio is too small for Mayweather.................

[steaway]

Please check this out

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uOfUhf3kMMo

[B.U.R.N.E.R]

Dude still didnt say. I see thru your agenda been I didnt just join like all these other dudes. I know your how threads are. "Floyds a bum with defense". So I expected you to duck my question 4 times. If Floyd wins you wont give him ANY credit.

[carts]

Skillz pay da bills....don't mater how strong or big you are; what it all comes down to is how good are you at the sweet science. There is not fighter out there on Mayweather's skill level.

true!! and add the TS opinion on floyds height and reach advantage.. PAC has no way to beat floyd.. so drop the ****** OST and fight PAC within the NSAC rules.. lets get this on!!

[Reloaded]

Im mainly talking about reach and height!!! Burner.

Floyd is a better fight than Clottey to, knows how to use his height more effectively.

This aint pole vault its boxing if men weigh the same its a fair fight .

[Jermaine83]

I dont get this post. Every person with eyes knows Floyd is taller and has a longer reach. Yes he will use it. Yes its up to Pac to do something about it. No thats not a reason to **** on him if he wins.

What if Mosley stopped Floyd in round 2 he doesnt get credit because hes taller and has a longer reach? Didnt Quintana beat Paul Williams? Hasnt Pac beaten fighters with longer reaches then him? Hes beaten taller fighters correct?

Does boxing have height and reach classes? No they have WEIGHT classes.

Pac in his last fight was 145.75 pounds.

Floyd was 146 Pounds.

Dymand kid, please read this post above and below AND RESPOND:

Does boxing have height and reach classes? No they have WEIGHT classes.

Pac in his last fight was 145.75 pounds.

Floyd was 146 Pounds

[Dynamite Kid]

Dude still didnt say. I see thru your agenda been I didnt just join like all these other dudes. I know your how threads are. "Floyds a bum with defense". So I expected you to duck my question 4 times. If Floyd wins you wont give him ANY credit.

First off if i wanted to discredit Mayweather why would i have to hide it, i will tell anyone who wants to listen im a Floyd hater, and what ?


Let me ask you something Burner, if Roy Jones beat Bernard Hopkins of 2001 would he, should he get more credit than he got for his previous win over Bernard Hopkins ? if the answer is yes then i ask why? he is same fighter right? is it because that there are valid criticism that Hopkins was not the same fighter when Roy fought him in 1993, therefore if Jones beat the 2001 version where he appeared to be at his very best that he should
get extra props? now by your logic if the rematch never happened that would be deemed not giving Roy his props to bring up that Hopkins was not the fighter he was in 2001? however if they do rematch and Roy beats him you would want to give him extra props for beating a better version, essentially you would be admitting that Jones 1st beat him when he was not as his peak, but you would deem that an excuse if the rematch never happened and that was all we had to go on.

Your just a fanboy.

[check hook]

Bull****.

Floyd weighed 146 for Mosley.

Pac weighed 145.75 for Clottey.


Pac can fight Cotto and Clottey who is bigger than even Floyd but somehow Floyd is too big? Bull****.

co-sign........Floyd is a smal welter.....i LOL when ppl say he was wearing 160 vs Shane.

[Jermaine83]

i don't think he's discrediting a potential win, nor has he brought up weight.

What he's getting at is mayweather's height, reach, and abilities are too much for pacquiao.

Am i getting this right, dk?

so if this is the case then floyd should not fight pacman but claim he would beat him....???
Basically no one could beat floyd in boxing right now...do you agree d.k???

[B.U.R.N.E.R]

First off if i wanted to discredit Mayweather why would i have to hide it, i will tell anyone who wants to listen im a Floyd hater, and what ?


Let me ask you something Burner, if Roy Jones beat Bernard Hopkins of 2001 would he, should he get more credit than he got for his previous win over Bernard Hopkins ? if the answer is yes then i ask why? he is same fighter right? is it because that there are valid criticism that Hopkins was not the same fighter when Roy fought him in 1993, therefore if Jones beat the 2001 version where he appeared to be at his very best that he should
get extra props? now by your logic if the rematch never happened that would be deemed not giving Roy his props to bring up that Hopkins was not the fighter he was in 2001? however if they do rematch and Roy beats him you would want to give him extra props for beating a better version, essentially you would be admitting that Jones 1st beat him when he was not as his peak, but you would deem that an excuse if the rematch never happened and that was all we had to go on.

Your just a fanboy.

Your example doesnt correllate to Floyd vs. Pac at 147.

The P4P 1 and 2.

The Number 1 and 2 WW's.

If Floyd wins will you give him credit . Yes or No?

[Dynamite Kid]

so if this is the case then floyd should not fight pacman but claim he would beat him....???
Basically no one could beat floyd in boxing right now...do you agree d.k???

so if this is the case then floyd should not fight pacman but claim he would beat him....???

If you read the OP post to the thread you will know that is not what im saying.

Im not saying now one could beat him, im saying % are in his favour in potential match ups with Williams and Pac, for different reasons, as explained in the opening post, not that i would not like to see them happen, just my break down of how i think they would do and why i think he would hold advantages over each individual.