why aren't sr. and roger reputable? or let me ask this, brother ****m is an ex con just like floyd sr. doesn't that make him not reputable?
My point is floyd, naz, roger thats almost 125 yrs boxing experience. Brother ****m knew something that why he checked the wraps. To that point, margarito never had been caught with plaster. Maybe he got a tip. Maybe he saw something. We'll never know but he turned out to be correct.
So what if floyd sr. has dealt drugs or been in prison. That doesn't mean his accusation is false. That man has trained dozens of fighters and was good enough to challenge Sugar Ray Leonard. I think we can agree he knows boxing. Obviously he is biased and way too close to the situation.
He has never accussed another fighter of being on PED's. Just like Canseco has never accused anyone who didn't turn up positive.
My point is floyd, naz, roger thats almost 125 yrs boxing experience. Brother ****m knew something that why he checked the wraps. To that point, margarito never had been caught with plaster. Maybe he got a tip. Maybe he saw something. We'll never know but he turned out to be correct.
So what if floyd sr. has dealt drugs or been in prison. That doesn't mean his accusation is false. That man has trained dozens of fighters and was good enough to challenge Sugar Ray Leonard. I think we can agree he knows boxing. Obviously he is biased and way too close to the situation.
He has never accussed another fighter of being on PED's. Just like Canseco has never accused anyone who didn't turn up positive.
Comment