I know the man is great. I have seen some of his fights and his win vs SRL. What confuses me is that there are some that call him the greatest fighter P4P of all time or at least one of them. I have not followed his career and have only "boxrec'd" his record. I notice that the fighters of note that he has fought, he has lost to. Beat SRL, but then quit in the rematch and lost the third fight, lost to Benitez, lost to Hagler, lost to Hearns, lost to Pazienza 2wice, lost to Castro, lost to Camacho 2wice.
Now I obviously know some of those were when he was out of his prime and some WELL out of his prime.
I am not debating this really, just trying to see what measures his greatness. Amount of fights? The era he fought in? Being the first to beat SRL? His high regard and popularity in Panama? A combination of them? etc...
Just trying to inform myself as a Boxing fan. That's all.
Now I obviously know some of those were when he was out of his prime and some WELL out of his prime.
I am not debating this really, just trying to see what measures his greatness. Amount of fights? The era he fought in? Being the first to beat SRL? His high regard and popularity in Panama? A combination of them? etc...
Just trying to inform myself as a Boxing fan. That's all.
Comment