vitali vs maskev

[The Troll]

This mother****er doesn't care about wrong or right, or logic. He just wants to get under peoples' skin, and to feel like he controls others' emotions with his bull**** opinions that he tries to pass off as fact. He has always been, currently is, and always will be a **** riding ***** with no common sense and piss poor spelling skills who wants nothing more than to be able to tell himself that he "won" an argument, no matter how he has to twist, distort, or just plain lie about what others post. He secretly fancies himself as having the arguementative skills of a lawyer, but has the mental capacity of Ozzy Osbourne. See his opinion up there? See how he simply states it as a fact? Like it's up to him to decide lol. Look at every last one of his posts, and you'll see the same worthless **** lol

Would you prefer I put "I contend" before everything I post sunshine?

[Bozo_no no]

Still milking Rahman for that win against Lewis is very weak. Lewis has a weak chin and Rahman simply caught him. That is all Rahman is. A one punch wonder left over from the last decade. And you act like all these other guys I mentioned are on a level so below him, it is utterly ridiculous.

Rahman is his mandatory defense, wheather you like it or not.

The only thing utterly ridiculous is you trying to take a weak points win from 6 years ago and act like it's relevent, but then turn around and say Rahman's KO over Lewis isn't.

You have WEAK logic to support your WEAK notions.

Rahman and Barrett are the popular choices for a crack at Klitschko. How many people would agree with your take that
Krasniqui and Maskiev are just as deserving? And why is that?

[The Troll]

Rahman is his mandatory defense, wheather you like it or not.

The only thing utterly ridiculous is you trying to take a weak points win from 6 years ago and act like it's relevent, but then turn around and say Rahman's KO over Lewis isn't.

You have WEAK logic to support your WEAK notions.

Rahman and Barrett are the popular choices for a crack at Klitschko. How many people would agree with your take that
Krasniqui and Maskiev are just as deserving? And why is that?

AT the end of the day your the one who is trying to make Rahman sound like a credible contender mainly based on the his win of Lewis years ago. You cant point to any recent victories by Rahman to increase his stature. What are you going to point at. The Al Cole fight perhaps, or will it be the kali Meehan fight?

[Bozo_no no]

AT the end of the day your the one who is trying to make Rahman sound like a credible contender mainly based on the his win of Lewis years ago.

No, the WBC, Ring magazine, and the majorty of people are.

At the end of the day, you're trying to say that Krasniqui's win over Whittaker is more meaningful thatn Rahman's win over Lewis, and makes him a more worthy challenger despite the fact he's got a lot left to prove.

[The Troll]

No, the WBC, Ring magazine, and the majorty of people are.

At the end of the day, you're trying to say that Krasniqui's win over Whittaker is more meaningful thatn Rahman's win over Lewis, and makes him a more worthy challenger despite the fact he's got a lot left to prove.

Never said any such thing. I have said from the beginning of this post that I consider Rahman Barret etc basically at about the same level. I think Krasniqui personally would have the best shot at beating Klistchko at the moment(of the fighters discussed.)

[hollister]

Would you prefer I put "I contend" before everything I post sunshine?

Hey, If you thought I meant you, I apologize. I meant that ****er you seem to be trying to have an intelligent debate with, he's just not holding up his end lol

[SacTown1]

clearly, Oleg Maskaev deserves a shot at Vitali....

and clearly, Vitali is an awesome champion by accepting a challenge from someone with Maskaev's infinite credentials....

wait, who put this heroin needle in my arm? Nevermind everybody....

Quitschko sux, Maskaev sux, and the idea of them fighting for any title belt sux

[Truth]

clearly, Oleg Maskaev deserves a shot at Vitali....

and clearly, Vitali is an awesome champion by accepting a challenge from someone with Maskaev's infinite credentials....

wait, who put this heroin needle in my arm? Nevermind everybody....

Quitschko sux, Maskaev sux, and the idea of them fighting for any title belt sux

Damn SacTown1 is on a tear right now , but once again I agree! Your speaking nothin but the truth and that I must respect.

[Leo Pradun]

What is he prooving by fighting Rahman/Barret Valuev or Peter. All these guys are on the same level in my opinion. Fighting Maskaev is a fight just as valid as any other when Vitali cant access King's Title Holders. BTW you ever see that brutal KO Maskaev layed on Rahman, one of the best KO's ever.

do u have that anywhere is there anyway i can see dat through internet...

[The Troll]

do u have that anywhere is there anyway i can see dat through internet...

I dont know where you could find a clip of that knockout to be honest. Someobody around here might have that fight on file but I dont.