Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

vitali vs maskev

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    Originally posted by Bozo_no_no
    You are officailly one of the biggest idiots on this forum. I can see now why all these guys ignore you.

    Maskiev was knocked out by Goofi Whittaker, Kirk Johnson, and 300lb Corey (not Corrie) Sanders. Since then he hasn't beaten anyone with a pulse.

    He is NOT on the same level as Rahman, Barrett or Peter. Any of those guys would be a better fight than Maskiev.

    If this fight comes off, Vitali's last 3 opponents will have been Corrie Sanders, Danny Williams, and Oleg Maskiev.

    That's downright pathetic.
    Yeah and Rahman was knocked out by Maskaev. What does that say about Rahman? He is on the same level as Maskaev. At least Maskeav has fought some top quality opposition. Something that cannot be said of Peter or Valuev.

    Comment


    • #12
      Originally posted by McKay
      At least Maskeav has fought some top quality opposition. Something that cannot be said of Peter or Valuev.
      fighting top competition is one thing. getting KOd (like maskaev has) by top competition is another.

      Comment


      • #13
        When it's all said and done Vitali will wind up fighting Barrett after Barrett disposes of that waste Rahman.

        Comment


        • #14
          If anybody should get a title shot I would say it should be Krasniqui.
          Last edited by The Troll; 06-17-2005, 02:37 PM.

          Comment


          • #15
            Originally posted by McKay
            Rahman sucks. Maskaev is sucks. Meehan sucks. Barret is basically sucks. If anybody should get a title shot I would say it should be Krasniqui.
            Your tiny mind NEVER takes timelines into consideration.

            Maskiev knocked out Rahman in 1999. That was SIX years ago.

            Since then Rahman became the undisputed and liniar Heavyweight champion, and Maskiev was KO'd by 3 fringe contenders.

            Being an undefeated prospect is better than getting KO'd by 3 fringe contenders. Maskiev's wins since his KO losses don't include ANY wins over top 20 opponents.

            Come off it.

            Comment


            • #16
              Is This A ****ing Joke?!?!?

              Comment


              • #17
                Originally posted by Bozo_no_no
                Your tiny mind NEVER takes timelines into consideration.

                Maskiev knocked out Rahman in 1999. That was SIX years ago.

                Since then Rahman became the undisputed and liniar Heavyweight champion, and Maskiev was KO'd by 3 fringe contenders.

                Being an undefeated prospect is better than getting KO'd by 3 fringe contenders. Maskiev's wins since his KO losses don't include ANY wins over top 20 opponents.

                Come off it.
                sry, mckay. i have to agree with bozo on this one.

                Comment


                • #18
                  Rahman is overrated trash if I have ever seen it. Barret will defeat him.

                  Comment


                  • #19
                    Originally posted by McKay
                    Rahman is overrated trash if I have ever seen it. Barret will defeat him.
                    Classic of your bull ****. Your point is absolutly destroyed so you hop subjects.

                    I think Barrett will beat him too. That doesn't make Maskiev any better.

                    Comment


                    • #20
                      Originally posted by Bozo_no_no
                      Classic of your bull ****. Your point is absolutly destroyed so you hop subjects.

                      I think Barrett will beat him too. That doesn't make Maskiev any better.
                      Krasniqui is better than Barret Rahman or Maskaev who I still contend are all basically on the same level.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP