Can we stop with the Sergio Martinez was robbed by Paul Williams crap?

[Chuckguy]

The dude just put me on ignore again for calling out his bs... He doesn't even want to argue to prove his point because he's wrong... lol.

He's made because no one in this board other than African-Americans are Williams fans and Martinez is pretty much the most respected guy on here.

Thats a racist thing for you to say

[tesla_power]

I thought PW won by two points. But I won't quibble either way. However, he closed the stronger fighter and perhaps solved the riddle. Not to mention, is desperately seeking the rematch while Martinez doesn't seem as willing.

Serg is after revenge IMO. But one thing I don't understand is why Pwill is desperately seeking the rematch. He already beat him officially ( I got Serg on that but won't complain cause it's close). Don't misunderstand me, I want to see a rematch.

[deemo]

i agree it was a close fight but williams finished the stronger fighter and won by 2 points on my scorecard.

[Calilloyd]

Serg is after revenge IMO. But one thing I don't understand is why Pwill is desperately seeking the rematch. He already beat him officially ( I got Serg on that but won't complain cause it's close). Don't misunderstand me, I want to see a rematch.

He lost to Williams too. Why no revenge there? Especially when it would be a highly anticipated fight? Nobody cares about him losing to Margarito at this point. He gets a pass from almost everybody for that. And Margarito is not relevant anymore. And Williams soughta rematch with Margarito too after he beat him. Why wouldn't he want a rematch with Martinez? Especially since Sergio holds belts at 160.

[letsgobrady]

It an extremely close fight. I thought Williams outworked Martinez in the late rounds to win a close decision. The word robbery is waay to strong.
Saying Williams robbed him, is like saying Cotto robbed Mosley..
Very close fights but come on.. neither were robberies

close fight that sergio shouldn't have not lost i don't even think williams should have been givin credit for the knock down in the 1st round because it was behind the head

[B.U.R.N.E.R]

close fight that sergio shouldn't have not lost i don't even think williams should have been givin credit for the knock down in the 1st round because it was behind the head

No it wasnt. He hit him in the side of the head. Martinez head was turned and Williams threw a straight left that landed on the SIDE of his head.

[Calilloyd]

close fight that sergio shouldn't have not lost i don't even think williams should have been givin credit for the knock down in the 1st round because it was behind the head

Did Sergio complain about it? No. It was no rabbit punch if that's what you are implying. You get hit, go down, it's a knockdown.

[letsgobrady]

No it wasnt. He hit him in the side of the head. Martinez head was turned and Williams threw a straight left that landed on the SIDE of his head.

behind the ear which means it's not a legal punch.look at the quintann berto fight quintanna didn't get credit for his knock down of berto

[Martinez (KO)]

Im 46 and proably older than anyone on these boards and ive got more boxing experience than anyone here


And i say Martinez won that fight.

[Calilloyd]

Im 46 and proably older than anyone on these boards and ive got more boxing experience than anyone here


And i say Martinez won that fight.

Well I'm a lot younger than you and don't agree. I don't care if you're 100.