Great point.... Guilty....Guilty,....Guilty. We should all have to prove our manhood. IMDAZED whipped out his to prove he wan't stuffing a pickle in there.
Well that's how I would prove it, right? How about in this case?
oh because pac is doping every fight...lol hes never failed a drug test before...and apparently hes accepted the 14 day window deal...so chill your beans..
Pac is willing to prove his **** ain't a pickle but whipping it out aint enough though, yall wanna suck it dry. You can look but don't touch. If you want him to whip it out you got to compromise by keeping your mouth shut.
Don't be an idiot. Pacquiao didn't refuse, he tried to work his way around the test and Mayweather wasn't gonna allow that. Another way to debunk this ****ty post is that, Pacquiao was ready to negotiate with Paulie.
fist pac didnt have to agree to the test not required by the commission. but just to make the biggest fight possible he agreed and negotiated. but floyd grew a ***** and became even more bitchy. from there on it's what you call negotiations.
yea I know Pacquiao has been way more accomodating than I would have been in his position. I would have said "You want testing, get the commission to change their testing program. Otherwise, STFU and lets fight, *****."
How do you know Pac is clean. Having his poster on your wall doesn't count *******.
Pac is willing to prove his **** ain't a pickle but whipping it out. Whipping it out aint enough though, yall wanna suck it dry. You can look but don't touch. If you want him to whip it out and you you got to compromise.
You seem very interested in a conversation about penises. I'd rather not go there--hey, you're entitled. Anyway, getting back to Braddman's point, asking for proof is a bad circular argument.
Tweet
Comment