-
-
Alot of froch haters on here because of his arrogance and skin colour. With that are some awful lies about him that i will debunk, and not one of you can have one come back.
Lie 1-jean pascal weight drained. Terrible excuse. Pascal got schooled by froch. nO need to debunk anything. he choose to start his career at super middleweight, and was undefeated before he came against the cobra. The rest is history.
Lie 2-Jermaine taylor was "battering froch for 11 rounds before he fluked the ko".
This ones halarious. For starters froch won rounds 10 and 11 with ease, and was domianting talor from round 6 onwards with his jab.
here is video evidence of the press row actually scoring the fight to points to froch. As you can see at 1.45 of the video one US press row had it to taylor by 2, one to froch by one round and one had it a draw. Bare in mind this was going into the 12 which froch won 10-7 even without the knock.
On the judges score card 2 had it to taylor, 1 had it to froch, so yet again hardly a "ass whooping" Heres the vid below, debunk it please.
lie 3- Dirrell got a draw against froch, or maybe even a win. Well the fact that froch bloodied dirrells face after just 4 rounds, and cut his eye after 8, and landed the best shot against the running man dirrell in round 8 of the whole match. That aside, yet agan the press row had it to froch. Dan rafael graham houston allan green, emanuel steward and various oither top pundits had it to froch. That aside.....
Lets look at the official punch stats wihich clearly show froch won..
http://boxrec.com/media/index.php?title=Fight:1433578
Data Boxing Stats: Blows- Froch 153/475 32%, Dirrell 105/315 33%; Controls- Froch 123( 25 attacks), Dirrell 126( 29 clinches, 17 circles).
lie 4-kessler was busier than froch. Yes he was busier getting jabbed in the face. Heres a vid showing froch boxing the head off kessler. All the showtime pundits agred, the primtime pundit darren barker agreed and so did the ring side row again agree, froch won.
Enjoy and green k me as non of you can rebuttal truth
I have always been under the impression that you have to DECISIVELY beat the champ if you want the belt. Kessler didnt even come close!
He did not TAKE the title from Froch, the corrupt Danish Judges did. The video speaks for itself.Comment
-
plese answer why the pundit, press row, and judges, had it a draw/split decision going into the 12th round against taylor. Please answer.
Why did the press row, pundits score it to froch against dirrell, and why did the punch stats show froch won.
Im still awaiting a decent answer..
thanks.Comment
-
Froch won 4,5,10,11,12 clearly against Kessler.
You could also EASILY give the first 1-3 to Froch as well. Kessler only clearly won 8 and maybe 6,7.
Froch got his belt robbed in Saurerland homecooking (most corrupt promoter out there at the minute).
You go on about the Pascal-Froch card but yet ignore the fact one judge scored it 120-108 to Khan (against Kotelnik) which is nothing short of CORRUPT. Also, Kessler had Tilleman on his side.
M4af1 is the most biased poster on this site. Nothing he says is objective and all he ever talks about is Khan. TERRIBLE POSTER.
Anyway, Froch in my eyes in the best SMW holding wins over Kessler, Pascal, Taylor and Dirrell.Comment
-
Why would anyone bother?? The whole damn thing you posted was was BS, anyway you yourself here has just admitted that everything you posted was myth
Shattered you say why did Press Row and pundits have it to Froch in the Dirrell fight but the ITV commentator here in the UK kept saying Froch was finding it very hard and having a difficult time in there and said himself the fight was getting away from Froch.
As for punchstats??? Never put any faith in them myself, stats can be abused by anyone.Last edited by King_Lukas; 05-03-2010, 06:12 PM.Comment
Tweet
Comment