the carl froch myth debunker scrap book

[Shattered Jaw]

Like you when you watched Froch v Dirrell hey Shat

No, I re-watch all fights I comment on a lot. This one I have re-watched 4 times (God knows how - it's boring as hell), as recently as last week in fact.

For me, Froch and Dirrell clearly took 4 rounds each but after that you can toss a coin IMO.

[Sick/]

Froch didn't hit Kessler?

Where you watching through bold red and white cross tinted glasses by any chance?

Froch had Kessler like a rag doll in 4,5,10,11,12 with clean effective punching.....

did you score the fight for Froch?

[ma51f]

I'm not a charver and I'm definitely not uneducated...

well your def the worst poster.

ive lost count of the amount of times i've owned you.

i find it funny how its you who always red k's me

[swizz]

well your def the worst poster.

ive lost count of the amount of times i've owned you.

i find it funny how its you who always red k's me

he just got owned by me go look at the end of page 4

[King_Lukas]

No, I re-watch all fights I comment on a lot. This one I have re-watched 4 times (God knows how - it's boring as hell), as recently as last week in fact.

For me, Froch and Dirrell clearly took 4 rounds each but after that you can toss a coin IMO.

I must admit I watched this back 3 times, twice on Showtimes coverage and once on ITV, Bernstein, Tarver made arguments both ways and Press row had a Froch split.

But I just cant ever go for someone who lunges, throws wild haymakers and doesnt land and wins fights on activity, like Calzaghe I think its dull and aweful to watch.

[Shattered Jaw]

what bro i mean you guys come on here talk your ish and then i swear i wonder how tough you punks would be if you werent on a computer and let me tell you a shot taylor was schooling your boy kessler tax his ass, dirrell tax his ass king arthur will tax his ass and ward is gonna make him look silly

furthermore your post are all bias i mean is it a good trait for a man to be on anothers man's balls the way you are on froch

[King_Lukas]

i find it funny how its you who always red k's me

It doe'snt really matter though bud, it just shows that a lot of people out there when they see an alternative perception just react like bigots.

[Shattered Jaw]

I must admit I watched this back 3 times, twice on Showtimes coverage and once on ITV, Bernstein, Tarver made arguments both ways and Press row had a Froch split.

But I just cant ever go for someone who lunges, throws wild haymakers and doesnt land and wins fights on activity, like Calzaghe I think its dull and aweful to watch.

Yer man. It's preference. I'm glad you've re-watched it and are making a fair assessment on the fight, whether you thought Dirrell won or not. (Sure I can definitely see a Dirrell win - I don't actually have a problem with people saying he won. Just when they say OMFG@!)!!DIRELLROBBEDFROCH=BUMMKTFOBYTAYLORUNTILhe GasedOUT!!!!!lOLOL).

It's also preference what kind of fighter you like. I really, really, really enjoy watching Froch fight because of the inevitable drama.

[Shattered Jaw]

It doe'snt really matter though bud, it just shows that a lot of people out there when they see an alternative perception just react like bigots.

[slimshandy69]

First....... check the purple letters in the sig.




Second, as much as I like Froch. Kessler deserved that win. Making your opponent miss and not throwing **** back at your opponent = loss. I don't care if your opponent misses 70% of their punches, if you throw 0 punches, you deserve a loss. Froch just wasn't active what-so-ever, he didn't try to hit Kessler. He was too busy trying to fight like Dirrell. Kessler deserved the win.

froch rocked kessler a number of times, so how you said he threw 0 percent of punches is a terrible post, reguardless whether you are in carl froch firm or not.

Start forming ytour oown opinions and stop getting swayed by self hating white/racist black posts from people like british fan, london ben, etc.

i know you can be a better poster.