-
-
show me the proof before making claims.
the judges had froch behind and at the end of the day, they are the only people who matter. i dont need a pundit to tell me who's winning, i can see for myself and decide. Taylor was miles ahead
Direll: close but bias refereeing and hometown favourable judges got Froch the decision. most of froch's punches landed on the back of Dirells head or hit his glovesComment
-
Alot of froch haters on here because of his arrogance and skin colour. With that are some awful lies about him that i will debunk, and not one of you can have one come back.
Lie 1-jean pascal weight drained. Terrible excuse. Pascal got schooled by froch. nO need to debunk anything. he choose to start his career at super middleweight, and was undefeated before he came against the cobra. The rest is history.
Lie 2-Jermaine taylor was "battering froch for 11 rounds before he fluked the ko".
This ones halarious. For starters froch won rounds 10 and 11 with ease, and was domianting talor from round 6 onwards with his jab.
here is video evidence of the press row actually scoring the fight to points to froch. As you can see at 1.45 of the video one US press row had it to taylor by 2, one to froch by one round and one had it a draw. Bare in mind this was going into the 12 which froch won 10-7 even without the knock.
On the judges score card 2 had it to taylor, 1 had it to froch, so yet again hardly a "ass whooping" Heres the vid below, debunk it please.
lie 3- Dirrell got a draw against froch, or maybe even a win. Well the fact that froch bloodied dirrells face after just 4 rounds, and cut his eye after 8, and landed the best shot against the running man dirrell in round 8 of the whole match. That aside, yet agan the press row had it to froch. Dan rafael graham houston allan green, emanuel steward and various oither top pundits had it to froch. That aside.....
Lets look at the official punch stats wihich clearly show froch won..
http://boxrec.com/media/index.php?title=Fight:1433578
Data Boxing Stats: Blows- Froch 153/475 32%, Dirrell 105/315 33%; Controls- Froch 123( 25 attacks), Dirrell 126( 29 clinches, 17 circles).
lie 4-kessler was busier than froch. Yes he was busier getting jabbed in the face. Heres a vid showing froch boxing the head off kessler. All the showtime pundits agred, the primtime pundit darren barker agreed and so did the ring side row again agree, froch won.
Enjoy and green k me as non of you can rebuttal truth
You make some good points,
Pascall hardly looked weight drained to me, he looked big and strong on the scales.
The Taylor fight would have ended in a close split decision in taylors hometown had froch not ko'd him, froch did ko him so it doesnt matter anyway
the last two are harder to disagree with, i though Froch lost both of them a big reason being his own inactivity during a lot of the fightComment
-
Dirrell doesn't fight with his gloves up... Do you even watch boxing?
Dirrell fight with Froch: 4 rounds a piece and from there who knows? It was a scrappy fight with Dirrell running and spoiling. Very hard to score. Also, Dirrell rightfully got a point deducted.
Taylor was winning by SD on the cards going into the 12th. Froch was getting to him... it's not over until the fat lady sings.
Hardly any punches landed on the back of Dirrell's head. Maybe 2.
Hennessy wouldn't know how to bribe a playground child though, so I doubt it was corrupt. Just what the neutral and foreign judges preferred that night.Comment
-
READ MY ORGINAL POST, I SUPPLIED YOU WITH PUNCH STATS, VIDEO EVIDENCE.
Plus why is your opinion more important than the ringside press and the top pundits and more importantly the judges.
Do you want me to show you videos of dirrell admitting he lost round 12, quotes of gary shaw dirrells promoter admitting d.irrell ****ed up and lost fairly and videos shwing the showtime press row scoring t to froch??
I can if you want, i dont mind it makes my thread even more invincibleComment
-
Thing is I admire your passion and obvious research into this Nottingham based dull boring lunger with no slickness but why???
I mean you know damn well that Dirrell wouldve had to kill the guy to win anyway as this Super 6 thing is a lesson in hometown buttering.
In my view you are arguing the exact points for Frochs defeat in Denmark as others are Dirrells case over Froch in England, so really is there an element of hypocrisy here??Comment
-
First....... check the purple letters in the sig.
Second, as much as I like Froch. Kessler deserved that win. Making your opponent miss and not throwing **** back at your opponent = loss. I don't care if your opponent misses 70% of their punches, if you throw 0 punches, you deserve a loss. Froch just wasn't active what-so-ever, he didn't try to hit Kessler. He was too busy trying to fight like Dirrell. Kessler deserved the win.Comment
Tweet
Comment