COTTO or MOSLEY. who is the bigger draw.

[..WaRSpencE..]

If Cotto is the BIGGER DRAW (which he is)..

Why in the **** did Mayweather jr NEVER FIGHT HIM?!

[PH|L]

There you have it. Mayweather and Pacquiao couldn't even do that before they fought De La Hoya. Where's Mosley's big PPVs?

/end thread

Nah man there's the whole Mexico vs PR rivalry, which is huge.

Also, Cotto was coming off a win against Shane Mosley, which has a positive effect to someone's ability to draw since Mosley is a big name.

When Mosley finally met MArgarito, no MEX vs PR rivalry in play and most people thought Mosley was shot to bits.

[BoxerDood]

Nah man there's the whole Mexico vs PR rivalry, which is huge.

Also, Cotto was coming off a win against Shane Mosley, which has a positive effect to someone's ability to draw since Mosley is a big name.

When Mosley finally met MArgarito, no MEX vs PR rivalry in play and most people thought Mosley was shot to bits.

That's fair. But I still stand by my point that 90% of the attendance was Margarito's fanbase. The entire crowd was full of Mexicans.

And again, if Mosley was this big draw then why couldn't he do this like 4 months earlier against Mayorga in the same exact place? The only time he was able to draw was when he was in the ring with big names like De La Hoya, Vargas and Margarito. When has he done it otherwise? Cotto has plenty of times, for example the Gomez and Clottey fights. Mosley-Clottey was going to be an undercard fight. He can't hold his own event without a big name.

[Va_BoriKua]

wow *******s ARE RETARTED HERES SOMETHING FOR YA

Freddy Roach said that he chose Cotto over Mosley to fight Pacquiao because Mosley "wasn't a big enough PPV draw".

[Va_BoriKua]

wow *******s are retarted heres something for ya

freddy roach said that he chose cotto over mosley to fight pacquiao because mosley "wasn't a big enough ppv draw".

end of thread

[Versatility]

you keep bringing up the names cotto has fought clamiming he did great numbers yet you fail to show the numebrs you speak of.....what if shane was the one who fought gomez , do you have a guarantee it would'nt do just as good?..........

LOL STOP IT MAN...seriously your going no where with does and it keeps getting worst and worst each time. your losing your reputation if you have any....


shane mosley vs luis collazo crowd: 5k

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/12/sp.../12boxing.html

miguel cotto vs michael jennings (a nobody and after cotto lost to margarito) crowd: almost 10k

http://boxrec.com/media/index.php?title=Fight:1354808

[BoxerDood]

wow *******s ARE RETARTED HERES SOMETHING FOR YA

Freddy Roach said that he chose Cotto over Mosley to fight Pacquiao because Mosley "wasn't a big enough PPV draw".

Oh s**t, how'd I miss this post? Well there you go, straight out of Uncle Freddie's mouth. My work in this thread is complete.

Now can we stop with these threads? They're making NSB look horrible.

[baracuda]

LOL STOP IT MAN...seriously your going no where with does and it keeps getting worst and worst each time. your losing your reputation if you have any....


shane mosley vs luis collazo crowd: 5k

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/12/sp.../12boxing.html

miguel cotto vs michael jennings (a nobody and after cotto lost to margarito) crowd: almost 10k

http://boxrec.com/media/index.php?title=Fight:1354808

what makes you think cotto vs collazo would do better number than that?....where's your proof?

[Va_BoriKua]

what makes you think cotto vs collazo would do better number than that?....where's your proof?

lol your really an idiot

[baracuda]

wow *******s ARE RETARTED HERES SOMETHING FOR YA

Freddy Roach said that he chose Cotto over Mosley to fight Pacquiao because Mosley "wasn't a big enough PPV draw".

arent the cottards the ones who said freddie was full of **** scumbag before pac vs cotto?......now, youre using his words as a proof?......