mayweather beats pacquiao because...

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • PH|L
    Banned
    Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
    • Apr 2010
    • 919
    • 19
    • 10
    • 1,040

    #31
    Originally posted by crazyboy867
    hatton and cotto are not defensive fighters...they are always on the offensive. mayweather can fight both offense and defense depending on the situation.
    So can Pac.

    Hatton comes out guns blazing... Pacquiao fights on the defensive, very much on the back foot. He catches Hatton coming in, hurts him. Immediately switches to offensive mode.

    Cotto vs Pac. Pac comes out guns blazing. Cotto tries to box and counter. Pac starts to counter Cotto's jab, uses a tight defense against the ropes to get Cotto to open up more without taking much damage, and then beats him while he is open.

    Pac can fight both offense or defense depending on the situation too.

    Comment

    • F l i c k e r
      Il Principe
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Feb 2009
      • 20737
      • 1,323
      • 858
      • 83,771

      #32
      Originally posted by PH|L
      Pacquiao landed a pitiful amount of punches against Clottey? I think you need to rewatch that fight. Don't confuse number of punches landed with connect percentage.

      Pacquiao did what he had to do to win every round. The goal is to win the fight, something Pac did without even breaking a sweat. Everyone likes to bring up his bruised eye but the fact is that Pac looked like he could keep going for another 12 rounds after the fight and that he would win every one of those too. Who gives a **** about a bruised eye if you're winning every round and easily dominating the fight hands down?

      That fight just showed Pac's versatility. He can be a technical boxer with an extremely high connect % (see the Hatton and Cotto fights) or he can be a high volume puncher and outwork his opponent to an easy 12-0 decision.

      That's called versatility.
      Your just mouthing off now. You don't even know what your talking about anymore, that's why you bring up bruised eyes and other **** irrelevant to what we are talking about.

      You said Pacquiao was technical, I said he wasn't. You braught up Cotto, Hatton, and ODLH. I brung up Clottey and now you go on mindless rants.

      I think it's pretty obvious that you know Pacquiao isn't a technical boxer but just don't want to admitt it.

      Pacquiao is a great fighter, no argument there. Technically efficient? No. Enough said.

      Comment

      • PH|L
        Banned
        Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
        • Apr 2010
        • 919
        • 19
        • 10
        • 1,040

        #33
        Originally posted by F l i c k e r
        Your just mouthing off now. You don't even know what your talking about anymore, that's why you bring up bruised eyes and other **** irrelevant to what we are talking about.

        You said Pacquiao was technical, I said he wasn't. You braught up Cotto, Hatton, and ODLH. I brung up Clottey and now you go on mindless rants.

        I think it's pretty obvious that you know Pacquiao isn't a technical boxer but just don't want to admitt it.

        Pacquiao is a great fighter, no argument there. Technically efficient? No. Enough said.
        You didn't understand ****. Pacquiao is technical. I showed you three examples of fights where he was very technical, you came back with one where he wasnt. Just cause he is technical doesn't mean he has to be technical in every fight. A versatile fighter can implement many gamplans. Against Clottey, the best gameplan was to outwork him every round. Last I checked Pac won a shutout.

        Your argument is dumb as **** : Pac outworked Clottey, therefore he is not technical. It doesn't matter to you that he chose to box in some of his other fights and was extremely succesful.

        Just cause he shows a different skillset against Clottey doesn't erase the skills he showed in his previous fights.

        Comment

        • elfag
          Alpha fäggot
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Jan 2008
          • 15602
          • 3,485
          • 302
          • 65,929

          #34
          Pac and roach can make adjustments and out think some of these other guys but PBF is just superior in that regard. Pac leaves himself open for counters and Mayweather will be there to take advantage of that.

          They both have good handspeed, it wont be a factor though just as it wasnt a factor in the mosley/may fight. What will matter is PBF's superior reflexes and his defense and technically sound habits. He will be there to counter Pac all night.

          Comment

          • wizard king
            Banned
            • May 2009
            • 1846
            • 113
            • 79
            • 2,052

            #35
            Originally posted by PH|L
            You didn't understand ****. Pacquiao is technical. I showed you three examples of fights where he was very technical, you came back with one where he wasnt. Just cause he is technical doesn't mean he has to be technical in every fight. A versatile fighter can implement many gamplans. Against Clottey, the best gameplan was to outwork him every round. Last I checked Pac won a shutout.

            Your argument is dumb as **** : Pac outworked Clottey, therefore he is not technical. It doesn't matter to you that he chose to box in some of his other fights and was extremely succesful.

            Just cause he shows a different skillset against Clottey doesn't erase the skills he showed in his previous fights.
            i guess *******s are just as ****** as pac political career. thier is nothing techinical about pac fighting style. iam not even a floyd fan but get real for a ****ing change pac is know were near the skill set of floyd.roach can come up with plan a-z and pac is still not going to win. like i said be real for a ****ing change pac will not beat floyd.

            Comment

            • Kagami Taiga
              Generation of Miracles
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • Mar 2010
              • 19078
              • 703
              • 228
              • 40,183

              #36
              dude, wat is this debate about?? pac isnt a defensive fighter, pac is nowhere near as able to adjust as mayweather. most fighters arent, its just a fact. and finally pac is a rhythm fighter. he defense is kinda automatic...roach taught him that rhythem patter which helps him avoid some punches. thing is, mayweather is by far the best at figuring out rhythems. he'll pic pac apart after the first 2 rounds if he doesnt adjust.

              pac is great at what he does, throwing combo punches at angles, fast footwork and incredible stamina. lets not act like he has a incredible ring iq. u wont hear me goin around claiming mayweather is an amazing combo puncher. it just aint true

              Comment

              • jqSide
                Undisputed Champion
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Dec 2009
                • 5232
                • 551
                • 166
                • 11,252

                #37
                Originally posted by wizard king
                i guess *******s are just as ****** as pac political career. thier is nothing techinical about pac fighting style. iam not even a floyd fan but get real for a ****ing change pac is know were near the skill set of floyd.roach can come up with plan a-z and pac is still not going to win. like i said be real for a ****ing change pac will not beat floyd.
                Pac will beat Floyd, bro. REason why he's insisting on this PED TESTING ****. He knows it. Get real and wake up. I'm not even a May hater. Wake the *** up and stop hating.

                Comment

                • wizard king
                  Banned
                  • May 2009
                  • 1846
                  • 113
                  • 79
                  • 2,052

                  #38
                  Originally posted by JQside
                  Pac will beat Floyd, bro. REason why he's insisting on this PED TESTING ****. He knows it. Get real and wake up. I'm not even a May hater. Wake the *** up and stop hating.
                  no hate but put your points with you mouth is. i bet all my points vs your points that pac will not only lose but get koed or tko lets make the bet offfical. if the fight happens

                  Comment

                  • flour
                    Banned
                    Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                    • Apr 2010
                    • 160
                    • 11
                    • 6
                    • 197

                    #39
                    May blood drained mosley its a well documented fact found on 24/7

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP