mayweather beats pacquiao because...

[wizard king]

Pac is far from a slugger man. Here is Pac taking away Cotto's confidence in his jab (his best punch) in the 2nd round of their fight.



Watch Pac vs Hatton. Notice how Pacquiao completely nutralized Hatton's left hook (his best punch) right from the beginning.

Watch Pac vs Oscar. Notice how Pacquiao completely nutralized Oscar's reach advantage with his movement and angles right from the beginning.

Pac is the most underrated boxer on NSB. A slugger? gtfo. Just cause he's also good at slugging it out doesn't make him a slugger. It just makes him well rounded.

you do know that pac relies on game plan what you are claiming that pac is doing is nothing but him following a game plan once the game fails pac is lost in the sauce.like i said pac is nothing but a pattern figher who cant adjust and only relise on his speed and punch output. what ever game plan roach comes out with is going to go out the window against may.

[Too_Slick]

no he didt pac fought the same way he always did funny thing is when pac tried to do something diffrent cotto out box him.pac is too ****** to adjust on the fly pac has to follow a game plan or else he is ****ed

hehe this, funny but too true, if roach f's up on the plan like naz did last night pac is a goner.

[F l i c k e r]

Pac is far from a slugger man. Here is Pac taking away Cotto's confidence in his jab (his best punch) in the 2nd round of their fight.

Watch Pac vs Hatton. Notice how Pacquiao completely nutralized Hatton's left hook (his best punch) right from the beginning.

Watch Pac vs Oscar. Notice how Pacquiao completely nutralized Oscar's reach advantage with his movement and angles right from the beginning.

Pac is the most underrated boxer on NSB. A slugger? gtfo. Just cause he's also good at slugging it out doesn't make him a slugger. It just makes him well rounded.

First, Pacquiao isn't the most underrated boxer on NSB. If anything, he is overrated. Because people like you make him out to be something he is not.

Pacquiao is fast and powerful. Is he a technically efficient boxer? No.

You want to bring up fights? Go watch Pacquiao-Clottey. If Pacquiao was the boxing tactition your trying to make him out to be. Then why did he land such a pitiful amount of his punches?

If he was a technical boxer, he wouldn't have been throwing crap at a walking punching bag. He would have been picking apart the holes on a guy who doesn't even punch back.

[B-Money]

First, Pacquiao isn't the most underrated boxer on NSB. If anything, he is overrated. Because people like you make him out to be something he is not.

Pacquiao is fast and powerful. Is he a technically efficient boxer? No.

You want to bring up fights? Go watch Pacquiao-Clottey. If Pacquiao was the boxing tactition your trying to make him out to be. Then why did he land such a pitiful amount of his punches?

If he was a technical boxer, he wouldn't have been throwing crap at a walking punching bag. He would have been picking apart the holes on a guy who doesn't even punch back.

u cant bring up that fight thinking he'll do the same with mayweather. its a different fighter after all. and as far as i remember he won that fight convincingly.

all i know is pac will throw more punches than mosley. and wont be gassed at the end of rounds. it remains to be seen what will happen, we all say this and that.

[PH|L]

you do know that pac relies on game plan what you are claiming that pac is doing is nothing but him following a game plan once the game fails pac is lost in the sauce.like i said pac is nothing but a pattern figher who cant adjust and only relise on his speed and punch output. what ever game plan roach comes out with is going to go out the window against may.

Like I said Pacquiao has multiple gameplans and he can implement every one of them near perfectly. If the first one stops working cause Floyd adapts to it, he can switch up to the 2nd, and if Floyd adapts to it, he can switch up to the third... etc. Not to mention Pac's gameplans are the hardest to adjust to because he is the best at implementing them and he has the best strategist in his corner.

By the time Floyd has adjusted to all of Pac's gameplans he's already lost the fight.

[F l i c k e r]

u cant bring up that fight thinking he'll do the same with mayweather. its a different fighter after all. and as far as i remember he won that fight convincingly.

all i know is pac will throw more punches than mosley. and wont be gassed at the end of rounds. it remains to be seen what will happen, we all say this and that.

I can bring it up when discussing technical efficiency.

If Pacquiao was as smart and technical as that guy is trying to make him out to be, he wouldn't have landed such a miniscule amount of punches. He would have been picking apart Clottey.

It's alot easier picking apart a guy who doesn't punch back and Manny couldn't even do that.

Don't get me wrong. Manny is a great fighter but his computer(brain) isn't running on the technical boxer OS.

[boxer4life55]

yea pac can make plenty of changes himself

[Check]

Mayweather is a Gorilladog and Pac is just a simple human being. Beast always beats man if it doesn't have a gun.

[PH|L]

First, Pacquiao isn't the most underrated boxer on NSB. If anything, he is overrated. Because people like you make him out to be something he is not.

Pacquiao is fast and powerful. Is he a technically efficient boxer? No.

You want to bring up fights? Go watch Pacquiao-Clottey. If Pacquiao was the boxing tactition your trying to make him out to be. Then why did he land such a pitiful amount of his punches?

If he was a technical boxer, he wouldn't have been throwing crap at a walking punching bag. He would have been picking apart the holes on a guy who doesn't even punch back.

Pacquiao landed a pitiful amount of punches against Clottey? I think you need to rewatch that fight. Don't confuse number of punches landed with connect percentage.

Pacquiao did what he had to do to win every round. The goal is to win the fight, something Pac did without even breaking a sweat. Everyone likes to bring up his bruised eye but the fact is that Pac looked like he could keep going for another 12 rounds after the fight and that he would win every one of those too. Who gives a **** about a bruised eye if you're winning every round and easily dominating the fight hands down?

That fight just showed Pac's versatility. He can be a technical boxer with an extremely high connect % (see the Hatton and Cotto fights) or he can be a high volume puncher and outwork his opponent to an easy 12-0 decision.

That's called versatility.

[crazyboy867]

Pacquiao landed a pitiful amount of punches against Clottey? I think you need to rewatch that fight. Don't confuse number of punches landed with connect percentage.

Pacquiao did what he had to do to win every round. The goal is to win the fight, something Pac did without even breaking a sweat. Everyone likes to bring up his bruised eye but the fact is that Pac looked like he could keep going for another 12 rounds after the fight and that he would win every one of those too. Who gives a **** about a bruised eye if you're winning every round and easily dominating the fight hands down?

That fight just showed Pac's versatility. He can be a technical boxer with an extremely high connect % (see the Hatton and Cotto fights) or he can be a high volume puncher and outwork his opponent to an easy 12-0 decision.

That's called versatility.

hatton and cotto are not defensive fighters...they are always on the offensive. mayweather can fight both offense and defense depending on the situation.