It's a domination. Before this goes further I need to address something, when responding to someone be aware of what you tried arguing in the first place, my response was to you saying ''He's doing enough to win'', what you said there doesn't even begin to refute what I said as in that post I wasn't talking about domination I was talking about winning lopsided is a sign of doing more than what's required ot win.
Now on to why it is a domination, I will just go ahead and quote a previous post of mine.
Give it up, bro. Some people are just too ****** to get it.
It's called outboxing someone. When you're in a fight you're under no obligation to give your enemy a chance at victory.
If Mayweather pot shots Shane, it's Shane's responsibility to make that an ineffective way to win. If he can't find a solution that problem and loses in a one sided fight, he was essentially dominated.
It's called outboxing someone. When you're in a fight you're under no obligation to give your enemy a chance at victory.
If Mayweather pot shots Shane, it's Shane's responsibility to make that an ineffective way to win. If he can't find a solution that problem and loses in a one sided fight, he was essentially dominated.
by not potshotting a 38 year old WW.........but dominate him in a fashion .......like gatti and chico...........................no excuse floyd....PUT UP or STFU.................
floyd better stop mosley if he wants to impress. if not stop, then at least dominate mosley so bad people will call for his retirement.
if floyd wins by potshotting to a UD, that's some old bull****.
Tweet
Comment