its time for floyd to show us his "greatness"

[Parody]

It's called outboxing someone. When you're in a fight you're under no obligation to give your enemy a chance at victory.

If Mayweather pot shots Shane, it's Shane's responsibility to make that an ineffective way to win. If he can't find a solution that problem and loses in a one sided fight, he was essentially dominated.

Dont waste your time, TS is either new to boxing or trolling.

[Clyde Barrow]

We want entertainment, but a win is a win. PBF still earns his shine if he beats Shane in a boring fight, that's just not what we want to watch.

[STRUGG]

What are you saying he should do then?

gatti..............chico....................thats what im saying.........

[STRUGG]

Dont waste your time, TS is either new to boxing or trolling.

i aint new....i aint trolling.........Mister......

[STRUGG]

It's called outboxing someone. When you're in a fight you're under no obligation to give your enemy a chance at victory.

If Mayweather pot shots Shane, it's Shane's responsibility to make that an ineffective way to win. If he can't find a solution that problem and loses in a one sided fight, he was essentially dominated.

wrong..............floyd did enough to win..........shane did not adjust.........but wasnt dominated

[FeFist]

wrong..............floyd did enough to win..........shane did not adjust.........but wasnt dominated

What's required to win is winning 7 rounds ( assuming there are no point deductions and knock downs). If Floyd wins, 10-12 rounds, that's doing far more than what's required to win.

[STRUGG]

What's required to win is winning 7 rounds ( assuming there are no point deductions and knock downs). If Floyd wins, 10-12 rounds, that's doing far more than what's required to win.

thats a convincing win..........not a domination................

[FeFist]

thats a convincing win..........not a domination................

It's a domination. Before this goes further I need to address something, when responding to someone be aware of what you tried arguing in the first place, my response was to you saying ''He's doing enough to win'', what you said there doesn't even begin to refute what I said as in that post I wasn't talking about domination I was talking about winning lopsided is a sign of doing more than what's required ot win.

Now on to why it is a domination, I will just go ahead and quote a previous post of mine.

It's called outboxing someone. When you're in a fight you're under no obligation to give your enemy a chance at victory.

If Mayweather pot shots Shane, it's Shane's responsibility to make that an ineffective way to win. If he can't find a solution that problem and loses in a one sided fight, he was essentially dominated.

[STRUGG]

It's a domination. Before this goes further I need to address something, when responding to someone be aware of what you tried arguing in the first place, my response was to you saying ''He's doing enough to win'', what you said there doesn't even begin to refute what I said as in that post I wasn't talking about domination I was talking about winning lopsided is a sign of doing more than what's required ot win.

Now on to why it is a domination, I will just go ahead and quote a previous post of mine.

nope....i disagree.......that isnt a domination..........

[Pogue69]

What a load of crap. Expect no less from a Manny "The Warrior Princess" Quackiao fan.

If Floyd "dominates" then all the *******s will say Shane was old. He can't win with the mental midgets, so why should he give a **** what any off you asswipes think?