Comments Thread For: Photos: Floyd Mayweather, Shane Mosley Ready For War

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Rome-By-Ko
    The winner Is
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Mar 2009
    • 20157
    • 323
    • 332
    • 29,833

    #31
    Originally posted by Concussive
    True. Floyd is a vicious body puncher! I say he knocks Mosley out in 10! Mosley likes to pressure. He also loads up on his own body punches (which is what Floyd will counter all night. Not only that, Mosley is not so good on the inside, where he can definitely be touched up. You heard it here first...Floyd in 10.
    LOL So Shane's not good on the inside?If you don't mind me asking what make's you say that?Can you guide me too the fight were Mosley shows you he can't fight on the inside?May is a great body puncher do you really feel he is better then Mosley?Yea think about those I would like to know the answers.Mosley 11th rd KO.

    Comment

    • M.I.C.
      Undisputed Champion
      • Mar 2008
      • 3344
      • 193
      • 0
      • 9,683

      #32
      Floyd looks ready to dominate, no lie.

      Comment

      • Sugar Q
        Undisputed Champion
        • May 2009
        • 3384
        • 159
        • 0
        • 9,834

        #33
        Originally posted by romebyko
        So who has Floyd beat that's close to Mosley.Hatton I forgot lol.My Bad it had to be Judah LMAO.Dude come-on.

        What do you mean fast, hard punchers? Let's talk recently cause going back to light-wt is a waste of time. Oscar, Zab, Hatton, Mitchell, Corley. All either quick or hard punchers or both in some cases. Now look at the quick hard punchers Shane has fought and the result. The most recent is Collazo, Cotto, Mayorga. Now remember Shane was on roids for both Oscar fights and still lost the last one. Got love for Shane but I'll never forget his face when the decision was announced.

        Comment

        • deliveryman
          Your token white guy
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Mar 2006
          • 7592
          • 362
          • 178
          • 15,510

          #34
          Originally posted by Sugar Q
          What do you mean fast, hard punchers? Let's talk recently cause going back to light-wt is a waste of time. Oscar, Zab, Hatton, Mitchell, Corley. All either quick or hard punchers or both in some cases. Now look at the quick hard punchers Shane has fought and the result. The most recent is Collazo, Cotto, Mayorga. Now remember Shane was on roids for both Oscar fights and still lost the last one. Got love for Shane but I'll never forget his face when the decision was announced.
          Mayorga is considered "quick"?

          Comment

          • Sugar Q
            Undisputed Champion
            • May 2009
            • 3384
            • 159
            • 0
            • 9,834

            #35
            Originally posted by deliveryman
            Mayorga is considered "quick"?
            No he would be in the hard puncher category.

            Comment

            • deliveryman
              Your token white guy
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Mar 2006
              • 7592
              • 362
              • 178
              • 15,510

              #36
              Originally posted by Sugar Q
              No he would be in the hard puncher category.
              Yes, but you said:

              Now look at the quick hard punchers Shane has fought and the result. The most recent is Collazo, Cotto, Mayorga.
              .

              Which is different than just a "hard puncher"

              Comment

              • Sugar Q
                Undisputed Champion
                • May 2009
                • 3384
                • 159
                • 0
                • 9,834

                #37
                Originally posted by deliveryman
                Yes, but you said:

                .Which is different than just a "hard puncher"
                I also said:
                All either quick or hard punchers or both in some cases.

                Comment

                • And Still
                  Banned
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Apr 2010
                  • 2479
                  • 118
                  • 32
                  • 2,699

                  #38
                  Delivery,

                  I see quick OR hard punchers....

                  Comment

                  • Sugar Q
                    Undisputed Champion
                    • May 2009
                    • 3384
                    • 159
                    • 0
                    • 9,834

                    #39
                    Originally posted by And Still
                    Delivery,

                    I see quick OR hard punchers....
                    Good Look "And Still"

                    Comment

                    • Chief2ndzOnly!
                      Long Live Walt Liquor!!!!
                      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                      • Feb 2010
                      • 12629
                      • 1,561
                      • 1,396
                      • 222,500

                      #40
                      Originally posted by cixthree
                      Guess nobody noticed, Shane is bone dry while Floyd seems kinda hydrated. If Shane don't land that lucky punch that all the Floyd haters are gonna be praying for in the first 4, it a wrap.
                      Yeah, I noticed that bruh. But it doesn't really matter right now. It WILL matter when he steps in the ring on fight night. If he's bone dry then, then there will be a problem. But at the weight-in it don't too much matter.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP