Comments Thread For: Mayweather-Pacquiao: Roach Has a Drug Testing Solution

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • fabie
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • May 2009
    • 1498
    • 246
    • 180
    • 10,255

    #381
    Originally posted by Allucard
    They think they are better than Shane? **** them. Cutoff dates = you are hiding something and need time to drain it out of the system.
    That is exactly why this assumption doesn't take off from the ground because it is largely unfounded. That is a false surmation.

    Cutoff dates are like catchweights, still within the parameters of "legality" and both agrees to it.

    There are no policies regarding drug testings and cut off dates and it is about time that there should be one. I agree wholeheartedly.

    But until then we cannot go around accusing people according to one's demands either. Pacquiao's catchweight "demands" for example isn't mandatory, it is part of an agreement that BOTH sides can agree to.

    And so there has to be a middle ground to everything. But this shows the lack of authority and enforcement of the NSAC that they should foresee all issues regarding the sport of boxing in the state of Nevada.

    Comment

    • Bhopreign
      Banned
      • Jun 2006
      • 11273
      • 419
      • 100
      • 12,036

      #382
      Originally posted by JSS
      Spoken like a true HATER...
      No, spoken like a realist.

      Comment

      • jltsmae
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Sep 2005
        • 1645
        • 18
        • 1
        • 7,995

        #383
        Originally posted by Bhopreign
        I dont like the fact that Floyd would do a cutoff date, I think he's making a mistake. But if they did randome tests, like Mosley is doing and Pac is negative, it doesnt mean he wasnt positive for other fights, as well as any other fighter.
        So, if Pac will lost to Floyd with the USADA testing, it is okay to say that he lost to floyd because he has not used the PEDS, even if has not proven as a PED user, right? so how does he prove that he is not a PED user then?

        Comment

        • Bhopreign
          Banned
          • Jun 2006
          • 11273
          • 419
          • 100
          • 12,036

          #384
          Originally posted by fabie
          That is exactly why this assumption doesn't take off from the ground because it is largely unfounded. That is a false surmation.

          Cutoff dates are like catchweights, still within the parameters of "legality" and both agrees to it.

          There are no policies regarding drug testings and cut off dates and it is about time that there should be one. I agree wholeheartedly.

          But until then we cannot go around accusing people according to one's demands either. Pacquiao's catchweight "demands" for example isn't mandatory, it is part of an agreement that BOTH sides can agree to.

          And so there has to be a middle ground to everything. But this shows the lack of authority and enforcement of the NSAC that they should foresee all issues regarding the sport of boxing in the state of Nevada.
          Fine, then no fight.

          Comment

          • switchsouthpaw
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Feb 2007
            • 2669
            • 73
            • 6
            • 8,766

            #385
            Originally posted by Bhopreign
            I didnt even need to watch it, I already know what he said, he said he BELIEVES pac is on some type of SUPPLEMENTS. Saying BELIEVE and saying he IS are two different things, also he said SUPPLEMENTS! He then goes on to say IF he DID have steroids in his systems he doesnt believe he can beat Floyd, Im still waiting *******s.
            "Saying BELIEVE and saying he IS are two different things", both are insinuations of guilt, at the very least a presumption of guilt and without a shred of evidence to offer as proof. Are you sure you're not Joe Pesci from the movie "My Cousin Vinny", because you really stretch and parse words, not even coming remotely close to making sense.

            Comment

            • Bhopreign
              Banned
              • Jun 2006
              • 11273
              • 419
              • 100
              • 12,036

              #386
              Originally posted by jltsmae
              So, if Pac will lost to Floyd with the USADA testing, it is okay to say that he lost to floyd because he has not used the PEDS, even if has not proven as a PED user, right?
              Is that what you think? I never said that.

              Comment

              • fabie
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • May 2009
                • 1498
                • 246
                • 180
                • 10,255

                #387
                Originally posted by Bhopreign
                I didnt even need to watch it, I already know what he said, he said he BELIEVES pac is on some type of SUPPLEMENTS. Saying BELIEVE and saying he IS are two different things, also he said SUPPLEMENTS! He then goes on to say IF he DID have steroids in his systems he doesnt believe he can beat Floyd, Im still waiting *******s.
                So you don't weigh the Sr's notoriety and reliability as factors considering he was an abuser of drugs himself? That is really laughable.

                Comment

                • jltsmae
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Sep 2005
                  • 1645
                  • 18
                  • 1
                  • 7,995

                  #388
                  Originally posted by Bhopreign
                  Is that what you think? I never said that.
                  but you might.

                  Comment

                  • SkillspayBills
                    Garlic Butter Gang!
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Aug 2007
                    • 29181
                    • 2,155
                    • 3,739
                    • 61,188

                    #389
                    What's with everyone saying either a cutoff date or not? Have you guys ever had a GF? My goodness compromise is the key to success. They will HAVE to come to an agreement and this seems reasonable.

                    Comment

                    • Sweet Jesus
                      Banned
                      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                      • Dec 2009
                      • 11512
                      • 568
                      • 332
                      • 13,576

                      #390
                      No cutoff date. 60/40 Mayweather.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP