Comments Thread For: Mayweather-Pacquiao: Roach Has a Drug Testing Solution

[Bhopreign]

That's an incorrect description, rather than saying "Because Shane has NOTHING TO HIDE!!!!", perhaps you should say rephrase and say "Shane has everything to prove", since he was found to have taken PEDs.

Here is another question, name one time that Manny had/has tested positive for PEDs, just one time...anything...???

Shane never tested positive for anything, try again.

[johnm is...]

How many days is acceptable? Let me guess, however many days Floyd wants?

Random.

That is all.

[johnm is...]

LOL at you *****.

You keep convincing yourself that reasoning when the truth is Shane might even agree to drink his own piss if floyd has demanded that also just as long as he can take a shot at floyd or pac.

Suck it *****.

The "truth" based on one *******s opinion.

The "truth" is that Mosley is taking the test, and Pacquiao would not. So keep telling yourself whatever you need to.

[Bhopreign]

Random.

That is all.

Just a little blood is all we asking, one teaspoon.

[fabie]

Then dont ***** about a fight then, Manny laid down his groundrules to Floyd, Floyd obliged. Floyd laid down his groundrules to Manny, Manny said hell no. I would rather there be no fight if there isnt random testing, I dont want to see a cheater in the ring. You seem to not understand the statement, you cant have PROOF WITHOUT A TEST. So you saying there isnt any proof, of course there isnt, because the dummy wont submit to random testing, anybody with a brain would have to ask why wouldnt Pac submit to such a thing if he has nothing to hide, you can say whatever you want, I have a brain and common sense. Go convince yourself.

Well guess who is catching up. Floyd retired and un-retired and expect things to be the same. He isn't the top and he still have to prove it. You don't seem to understand that part.

So make up your rules just like Mayweather. An agreement is both sides agreeing to a contract. Not rules. Both have to agree towards a fight and so yes, it isn't one sided but if there is one to prove himself more it is Mayweather because his motives are questionable, he fights for money not championships and for the sport.

Do I consider him good at all? Of course, he could very well be one of the most skillful boxers of all time but haven't proven it yet. I am not a Mayweather hater, if at all. I am an Ali fan considering him as the greatest and being able to witness THRILLA IN MANILA as a young pugilist fan.

I want Mayweather to show his skills against Pacquiao. But flinging his demands as in drug testing isn't going to do it. Pacquiao on the other hand also have to step up however and whatever that means.

But to say that is only through Mayweather's contingent rule towards a fight then it may or may happen....

[JSS]

A LW? **** Outta here!!



Love the little ****er(No ****). He is a damn beast and the best fighter right no.

But all this excuses on why not to accept the tests are bull****!!

Team Pac already accepted the testing and Team Mayweather already accepted cut-off dates. Now it's just negotiating for the cut off dates - and Team Pac is already negotiating for a date closer (17days) to what Team Mayweather wants it to be (14days). In every business deal there are negotiations...and Team Pac is now doing what needs to be done to make the fight happen...F'n *****'s!!!

[Bhopreign]

Well guess who is catching up. Floyd retired and un-retired and expect things to be the same. He isn't the top and he still have to prove it. You don't seem to understand that part.

So make up your rules just like Mayweather. An agreement is both sides agreeing to a contract. Not rules. Both have to agree towards a fight and so yes, it isn't one sided but if there is one to prove himself more it is Mayweather because his motives are questionable, he fights for money not championships and for the sport.

Do I consider him good at all? Of course, he could very well be one of the most skillful boxers of all time but haven't proven it yet. I am not a Mayweather hater, if at all. I am an Ali fan considering him as the greatest and being able to witness THRILLA IN MANILA as a young pugilist fan.

I want Mayweather to show his skills against Pacquiao. But flinging his demands as in drug testing isn't going to do it. Pacquiao on the other hand also have to step up however and whatever that means.

But to say that is only through Mayweather's contingent rule towards a fight then it may or may happen....

So since youre a fan of boxing, you would want both fighters to enter the ring clean, am I right? And the only way to insure that is by random testing right?

[jltsmae]

You cant prove anything without a test, see where this is going?

if manny will take the test (don't take roid if he is really taking any with his previous fights) and found negative, how does it prove that he is not cheating (if he really is) with the COTTO et al fights?

[Bhopreign]

Team Pac already accepted the testing and Team Mayweather already accepted cut-off dates. Now it's just negotiating for the cut off dates - and Team Pac is already negotiating for a date closer (17days) to what Team Mayweather wants it to be (14days). In every business deal there are negotiations...and Team Pac is now doing what needs to be done to make the fight happen...F'n *****'s!!!

Why even a cutoff date? No cutoff for Shane.

[switchsouthpaw]

Shane never tested positive for anything, try again.

Shane "admitted" taking EPO to a grand jury and during his deposition he once again admitted to have unknowingly ingested PEDs, you really take liberty with the facts and instead opt for all things circumstantial.