Rewatching Froch-Kessler now....

[seany123]

stick

I didn't even think it was close. first time I watched I gave Kess 4 rounds. Then 2nd time (because I thought I must of been watching some other fight) I took a round away from him.

to watching football then m8 its an all round simple game ball goes in net goal lol . funny how froch was agressor against dirrell and he won while landing hardly anything yet kessler was agressor against froch and landed a lot more than froch did on dirrell yet somehow in nutthuggers eyes kessler didnt win lmfaoooooooooooooo

[V.WEBB]

Can someone link me to it? I was out of town and I didn't catch it. But I'm glad that Kess won, I had him winning it before the fight.

[Squirrel]

I've only seen it once but I gave it clear but close to Kessler.

There were some rounds that were close but I think Kessler convincingly edged them in terms of what boxing is meant to be scored on, though home-town judging/crowds would make it otherwise.

Froch had clear tactics of moving and circling then fighting in spurts and engaging periodically (rather than a full frontal assault) but the way he did it wasn't enough to give him marks for effective aggression, ring generalship etc. Lots of the time he was flying and spinning all over the place.

[Flab]

to watching football then m8 its an all round simple game ball goes in net goal lol . funny how froch was agressor against dirrell and he won while landing hardly anything yet kessler was agressor against froch and landed a lot more than froch did on dirrell yet somehow in nutthuggers eyes kessler didnt win lmfaoooooooooooooo

Froch was the aggressor the whole fight. (even backing up) I really want to see some punch stats because I know for a FACT Kessler didn't land more than Froch.

[seany123]

lol

Froch was the aggressor the whole fight. (even backing up) I really want to see some punch stats because I know for a FACT Kessler didn't land more than Froch.

dude did u just say froch was aggressor even when getting backed up lmfaoooooo ok m8 do u understand boxing at all have you seen numerous fights that aggressors mostly always win coz ring control seems like you havent . id like to see punch stats for dirrell froch too

[slimshandy69]

funny how u hide in your shell until at least 1 other poster agrees with u that froch was robbed and totally ignore fact that 90 percent on here had kessler winning and not to mention not 1 british media or pundit had froch winning the best they had was a draw for froch lmao butthurt i say yes u are and a deluded nutthugger

again yu have completely lied, darren barker scored it one round to froch. Most you ugly ****ers on here scored it on those ****ty streams, where you cant see ****. Plus half you lots streams went down.

As flab said watch it in high defination and tell me how froch lost that fight??

Two of my mates who hate froch scored it to froch by one round. Face it people on here hate froch hence why they scored it to kessler.

They know froch is the best in the super 6.

But im not worried hell beat abraham..

[rich6666]

Didn't press row score it a SD to Froch? If i remember correctly

[slimshandy69]

I've only seen it once but I gave it clear but close to Kessler.

There were some rounds that were close but I think Kessler convincingly edged them in terms of what boxing is meant to be scored on, though home-town judging/crowds would make it otherwise.

Froch had clear tactics of moving and circling then fighting in spurts and engaging periodically (rather than a full frontal assault) but the way he did it wasn't enough to give him marks for effective aggression, ring generalship etc. Lots of the time he was flying and spinning all over the place.

you watch it on high def???

ive caught some mother ****ers out on here thats streams def went down...i caught one flid scoring round 5 to froch, arguebly the most dominat round from both fighters.

[P4P Opinion]

Just re-watched the fight now and I've changed my mind. I watched it first time under a beer haze, so I excuse myself a little and there was only a two round difference. At first I gave it to Kessler by a point, but now I give it to Froch by a point. It was an extremely difficult fight to score though, as many of the rounds were unbelievably close. I felt Froch did enough down the stretch to win the decision, although I have no problem with anyone giving it to Kessler by up to two rounds, such was the nature of a lot of the rounds. Anyone who gave either fighter more than a two point edge got it completely wrong and I'd question if they know how to score a fight.

I imagine many of the people who scored it not close just watched a stream and were seduced by the crowd reaction. Kessler is a worthy champion anyway, although I have some sympathy for Froch.

[seany123]

shamdy

again yu have completely lied, darren barker scored it one round to froch. Most you ugly ****ers on here scored it on those ****ty streams, where you cant see ****. Plus half you lots streams went down.

As flab said watch it in high defination and tell me how froch lost that fight??

Two of my mates who hate froch scored it to froch by one round. Face it people on here hate froch hence why they scored it to kessler.

They know froch is the best in the super 6.

But im not worried hell beat abraham..

is this the same darren barker that spars nearly every fight with froch yes lol . do u even read posts or is your head just filled with trying to convince yourself froch got robbed 24/7 i watched it on a 42 inch tv as i bought the ppv and fyi i dont hate froch far from it but i know who won that fight and it was kessler by 2 points