Anyways, don't really bought much in the ****m hype yet but not because of reasons you stated. Because never knew much of him except the bhop-pav, mosley-marg, bhop-trinidad fights. Those are generally come-forward, power punching boxers. But if he could make this a competitive fight, even if it end up in a loss, I will consider him the truth.
And he could say what he wants when he wants it. Try to shed that onion skin of yours.
If you could defend another trainer's (floyd sr/roger) assumption that pac is on drugs, then you accept another trainer's (naz) assumption that he is not on drugs.
I'll say it again. I don't care if ****m thinks Floyd is the biggest jerk in America. The problem is him claiming Mayweather has no right to demand OSDT against Pacquiao. He didn't exactly say this, but his statement that "Just because he's winning, people want to suspect him" is a bit hypocritical when he's obsessive compulsive about checking hand-wraps since he knows the commission doesn't do a good enough job.
It appears you're trying to talk to Burner through me with your constant whining about peoples personal lives. Go post in his thread if you want to discuss that, because it's off-topic here.
it isnt hypocritical because it has never been demanded before SURPRISE
checking handwraps isnt some crazy idea Naz came up with.
it is a very weak arguement
now please go ahead and say:
"It should be implemented for everyone"
"He should have just took the test"
Well, I will assume that instead of providing some validity to your moronic claims, you are taking this time to ********** furiously to the wall paper image you have of Floyd on your home computer as your mother is knocking on your door warning that you better not be doing the exact thing you're doing again or its back to counseling and cotillian classes for you. Anyway, this post below gives me a better idea of the type of "man" you are.
Originally posted by BIGPOPPAPUMP
Originally posted by PureBoxer
Good post. Kadyo and Chups continue to troll this thread and red k anyone who disagrees with their biased opinions.
Good lord. An ALT account after all. After doing an IP check, you have had at least a dozen accounts banned for a mountain of violations and numerous violation notes for nearly every possible offense possible on these forums. And looking at the post history of these banned accounts, it's obvious you have been anti-filipino and anti-pacquiao for quite some time. :gay:
Well, I will assume that instead of providing some validity to your moronic claims, you are taking this time to ********** furiously to the wall paper image you have of Floyd on your home computer as your mother is knocking on your door warning that you better not be doing the exact thing you're doing again or its back to counseling and cotillian classes for you. Anyway, this post below gives me a better idea of the type of "man" you are.
Anyways, don't really bought much in the ****m hype yet but not because of reasons you stated. Because never knew much of him except the bhop-pav, mosley-marg, bhop-trinidad fights. Those are generally come-forward, power punching boxers. But if he could make this a competitive fight, even if it end up in a loss, I will consider him the truth.
And he could say what he wants when he wants it. Try to shed that onion skin of yours.
If you could defend another trainer's (floyd sr/roger) assumption that pac is on drugs, then you accept another trainer's (naz) assumption that he is not on drugs.
This!
Just cause ****m talked heat towards Floyd and spoke about Pacquiao then all this hate?
Comment