Rank your top six supermiddleweights

[Ch@mpBox@PR]

I agree that's why i have him bottom out of the current S6 (not counting Green)

Ward : decent resume + he beat the man at SMW = fact

Kessler : Lost to ward, but was the SMW n1 before, then beat Froch (the other SMW champ)

Froch : Best resume at SMW maybe? Pascal, Taylor, Dirrel and close loss to Kessler

Dirrel : Doing well vs AA was wilting a bit under pressure, but he outbox AA 10 rounds straight and got a win. Vs Froch he lost (officially) and his running + Froch's recent run at SMW im gonna put him behind Froch.

AA: Beat a Taylor Froch and Pavlik had brutally KTFO, then lost 10 rounds clear to Dirrel.. that to date is HIS 2 FIGHTS AT SMW!! how can he be high on anyones list??

Co ****ing Sign!!



Best Post in this thread by far

[MOTHER DUCKER]

Bute
1.Andrade x2
2.Bika
3.Miranda
4.Berrio
5.Zuñiga

Kessler was N1 SMW i think a great win tho

Bute has depth but Ward has more quality i think

But remeber he lost to Andrade once

[Ch@mpBox@PR]

Kessler was N1 SMW i think a great win tho

Bute has depth but Ward has more quality i think

yes but one win doesnt cut iT!

Bute have a better overall resume, but Wards win over Kessler is the better win !

[heat27]

1. Ward
2. Bute
3. Dirrell
4. Kessler
5. Abraham
6. Froch
________

[boxingking500]

Kessler was N1 SMW i think a great win tho

Bute has depth but Ward has more quality i think

But remeber he lost to Andrade once

dont give me that "He won and you know it"...


didnt bute outclass andrade in the rematch in 4 rounds

[daggum]

Horrible rankings. How can Dirrell be above Froch and Froch above Kessler? Are you saying that results doesn't matter and only your own personal scoring via a bad internetstream does?

Who won Ali-Norton III?? And what about Holmes-Spinks II?? Or De La Hoya-Sturm???

cause rankings aren't based on just 1 fight but over a course of many fights. they also aren't based on official decisions but how i saw the fight. i score fights on clean punches mostly not who comes forward. dirrell beat froch and abraham so he's above him. froch is above kessler cause he beat pascal and taylor and the kessler fight was very close and he has a case for winning or at least a draw while kessler hasn't beaten anyone legit in years. just like i wouldn't have mayweather as a top welterweight cause he hasn't beaten one in years. and i would have martinez above floyd as a p4p fighter cause his last 3 fights were against top competition and he won at least 2 and against williams it could have gone either way which proves he can compete against any fighter. froch may have lost officially to kessler but he proved he was right there with him and his better resume puts him ahead.

[MOTHER DUCKER]

dont give me that "He won and you know it"...


didnt bute outclass andrade in the rematch in 4 rounds

Andrade knocked him out

[DiegoFuego]

this thread is boxingscene in a microcosm -- too many idiots to count.

I know we're all free to our opinion, but when people are putting Froch and Abraham above Dirrell, we got seriously moronic people on the forums

[daggum]

Andrade knocked him out

bute clearly beat the 20 count

[TBear]

There have been plenty of suprises in the supersix, alot of close fights and with Bute outside looking in it is hard to tell because he's not facing the same guys. I actually wanted to here everyones take on it.
Thanks