Antonio Tarver is a better TV boxing commentator/analyst than Al Bernstein
Collapse
-
-
Al Bernstein has been analyzing boxing since the early 80s. He's one of the best commentators.
Its quite clear you made this thread & formed this opinion because tarver said he thought kessler won.
You are too obvious & predictable tunney.
Froch won that fight btw.
Kessler whooped that assComment
-
Comment
-
A high-profile professional boxing commentator/analyst should have the ability to comment without bias.
Tarver is able to be fair and objective and not root for one or the other fighter, Bernstein has never been able to do so.Comment
-
I watched the Showtime version of Kessler-Froch and found Al Bernstein to be more biased in favor of Carl Froch than the two UK commentators this afternoon. Hard to believe such an experienced "expert" analyst would actually score the fight for Froch.
But admirably, Antonio Tarver not only more observant, he was fair and objective about both fighters in his comments throughout the fight, and correctly scored it for Kessler.
I hope old Bernstein retires soon and Antonio becomes his permanent replacement.Comment
-
Tarver is an excellent commentator IMO as well. He always brings boxing knowledge to the table and is a pretty smart guy who can think on his feet. I think he's way better than Roy, George or Lennox. He's now my favorite commentator.Comment
-
Tarver's comments are more accurate and insightful than Bernstein and most other analysts/commentators.Comment
-
to be fair, it's difficult not to like Froch. He's a pretty unique character in the boxing world and I really hope he bounces back and beats Abraham.
That said, Kessler won that fight by at least 2 rounds. I felt at the midway point that Froch was actually ahead and on the verge of taking control of the fight. But he didn't kick on and he allowed Kess to edge almost every round in the second half of the fight. I don't think there can be any argument with the result.
It was a very close fight, but the right man won.Comment
Comment