Those Froch Kessller Scorecards WERE A JOKE!!!

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Carlsson
    Contender
    Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
    • Sep 2009
    • 127
    • 6
    • 0
    • 6,220

    #21
    Originally posted by The Hate Giver
    117-111?

    116-112?

    115-113 Was the most decent.

    I thought Froch won a very very close fight. I guess its revenge from the boxing gods via home cooking robbery by denmark promoters for the british robbery of andre dirrell.

    That referee was also crooked as ****. He never warned kessler for blows to the back of the head & low blows. As soon as froch did it it was a warning.

    As for the 2 scumbag danish referees,Daniel Van de Wiele 116-112 | judge: Roger Tilleman 117-111 you ought to be be banned from boxing.

    Roger Tilleman was a staple in european robberies which includes the Greatest Robber of them all Sven Ottke.

    It was a close fight, but if there was an example of a fighter having to thoroughly beat a champion to take the title its this fight. Blatant home cooking scoring & refereeing.
    i respected you a lot earlier. the hate giver. super cool


    but how did you honestly have froch winning that fight??

    you not a true boxing fan...

    Comment

    • The Hate Giver
      Banned
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Mar 2010
      • 1217
      • 109
      • 41
      • 1,373

      #22
      Originally posted by Carlsson
      i respected you a lot earlier. the hate giver. super cool


      but how did you honestly have froch winning that fight??

      you not a true boxing fan...
      ive been watching boxing since the late 70s.

      Froch won that fight at the very least deserved a draw. Im not british nor danish. I have no emotional attachment unlike you to these fighters.

      Froch won that fight.


      There's a reason why Kessler was undefeated while fighting almost all of his fights in denmark...


      but as soon as he fought a elite fighter outside of denmark he always lost.

      btw,

      I LOVE DANISH PASTRY & CONNIE NIELSEN.

      Comment

      • Rome-By-Ko
        The winner Is
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Mar 2009
        • 20157
        • 323
        • 332
        • 29,833

        #23
        I had Froch by two rounds.But it was a close fight.Kessler showed he still has something left which I thought he would not have and Froch as he always done fought like a warrior.I feel both of these guy's did not disappointed great fight.But the judges were bad I don't mind Froch winning but what the hell was those scores it was a sin.Froch really handled it well.

        Comment

        • The Hate Giver
          Banned
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Mar 2010
          • 1217
          • 109
          • 41
          • 1,373

          #24
          Originally posted by romebyko
          I had Froch by two rounds.But it was a close fight.Kessler showed he still has something left which I thought he would not have and Froch as he always done fought like a warrior.I feel both of these guy's did not disappointed great fight.But the judges were bad I don't mind Froch winning but what the hell was those scores it was a sin.Froch really handled it well.
          i had 7 rounds to 5 for froch too.

          Comment

          • FeFist
            No.1
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Jun 2008
            • 9251
            • 576
            • 357
            • 29,695

            #25
            Don't understand the logic of agreeing with a 115-113 score card but thinking 116-112 is a robbery. Is it inconceivable to think a judge couldn't see a close round in Kessler's favour?

            Comment

            • Jim Jeffries
              rugged individualist
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Oct 2007
              • 20741
              • 1,376
              • 2,868
              • 54,838

              #26
              Originally posted by FeFist
              Don't understand the logic of agreeing with a 115-113 score card but thinking 116-112 is a robbery. Is it inconceivable to think a judge couldn't see a close round in Kessler's favour?
              I find it hilarious that most of the people calling this fight a robbery had Froch winning 115-113, meaning one close round the other way and it's a draw.

              Comment

              • DiLLiNGER
                Banned
                • Jan 2009
                • 6093
                • 324
                • 423
                • 7,749

                #27
                Originally posted by The Hate Giver
                117-111?

                116-112?

                115-113 Was the most decent.

                I thought Froch won a very very close fight. I guess its revenge from the boxing gods via home cooking robbery by denmark promoters for the british robbery of andre dirrell.

                That referee was also crooked as ****. He never warned kessler for blows to the back of the head & low blows. As soon as froch did it it was a warning.

                As for the 2 scumbag danish referees,Daniel Van de Wiele 116-112 | judge: Roger Tilleman 117-111 you ought to be be banned from boxing.

                Roger Tilleman was a staple in european robberies which includes the Greatest Robber of them all Sven Ottke.

                It was a close fight, but if there was an example of a fighter having to thoroughly beat a champion to take the title its this fight. Blatant home cooking scoring & refereeing.
                You're mad son haha..this shows how much of a ******* you are..you drama queen boxing ain't for you...

                Comment

                • The Hate Giver
                  Banned
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Mar 2010
                  • 1217
                  • 109
                  • 41
                  • 1,373

                  #28
                  Originally posted by DiLLiNGER
                  You're mad son haha..this shows how much of a ******* you are..you drama queen boxing ain't for you...
                  wtf does pac have to do with this?

                  Comment

                  • DiLLiNGER
                    Banned
                    • Jan 2009
                    • 6093
                    • 324
                    • 423
                    • 7,749

                    #29
                    Originally posted by The Hate Giver
                    wtf does pac have to do with this?
                    Well that's all you normally talk about.. hatin on money may 24/7..so it doesn't surprise me if you had froch winning the fight.

                    Comment

                    • The Hate Giver
                      Banned
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • Mar 2010
                      • 1217
                      • 109
                      • 41
                      • 1,373

                      #30
                      Originally posted by DiLLiNGER
                      Well that's all you normally talk about.. hatin on money may 24/7..so it doesn't surprise me if you had froch winning the fight.
                      you dont know ****. ive been in the boxing history section. with threads created with this account & my old banned account.

                      have you been to the history section & posted?


                      or do you just spend all your time defending against mayweather haters?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP