Emanuel Steward - heavyweight division is the weakest that I ever saw it

[boxingp4p]

Steward has also said that Haye would get KOed by Wlad in 4, so I'm sure you agree with that, too?

Oh and don't nitpick, in that interview Steward says that if Wlad keeps dominating 2 or 3 more years he'll be an ATG, you agree with that too, right?

i agree with most of what steward says including beating haye . Steward also said that he doesnt see the division getting better for at least five years so wlad will become an atg for beating a weak heavyweight division fo 2/3 more years?

[$partacus]

All the Haye nuthuggers are ducking this point, like their hero is ducking the Klitschkos

How is anyone ducking it? He also says 10 or 12 more defenses.

[Pirao]

i agree with most of what steward says including beating haye . Steward also said that he doesnt see the division getting better for at least five years so wlad will become an atg for beating a weak heavyweight division fo 2/3 more years?

So? It was what Joe Louis did. Maybe you only agree with Steward on the points that fit your agenda?

[Pirao]

How is anyone ducking it? He also says 10 or 12 more defenses.

So then you agree with everything Steward says or not? Speak clearly, like this:

"I agree with Steward, Haye would get KTFO in 4 by Wladimir"

[$partacus]

So then you agree with everything Steward says or not? Speak clearly, like this:

"I agree with Steward, Haye would get KTFO in 4 by Wladimir"

All i'm going to say is that if your fighters trainer says the same things the people you call haters say about the Klitschko's, then that must make him a hater or he and the "haters" are speaking the truth

[Rosseboi]

I think people are looking at this right, it's clearly been taken out of context.

For example Steward said he and Vitali laugh about the Lennox fight and Vitali admits it was the best thing that happened to him.....well....it is. Does that make Vitali bad? Does the fact Vitali is in a weak area make him bad? Or Wlad?

If Tyson were around today instead of th 80's dominating by that logic he would be far from an ATG because his era would be 'weak'. See guys? It's all about context.

[boxingp4p]

So? It was what Joe Louis did. Maybe you only agree with Steward on the points that fit your agenda?

didnt i just say i agreed with most of what steward said ? i was just pointing out that you were picking and choosing points in the article by pointing out that steward said that wlad would be an atg in 2/3 years if he continues dominating but ignoring the fact that he said that the division was the weakest he had ever seen it , so does dominating a weak division make you an atg ?

[Pirao]

All i'm going to say is that if your fighters trainer says the same things the people you call haters say about the Klitschko's, then that must make him a hater or he and the "haters" are speaking the truth

And when said haters only agree with the parts that fit their agenda, we can also conclude that the haters are full of ****

[Joeyzagz]

So? It was what Joe Louis did. Maybe you only agree with Steward on the points that fit your agenda?

WHen Steward says brutally truthful things like "This era is the weakest ever, and that Wlad is not an ATG" I tend to believe it because he is risking his job security by going against his employer. He has nothing to gain by saying these things except for self-integrity.

When he says positive things like Wlad would knock Haye in 4, I feel that he is trying to balance things out as to not piss of Wlad. Or maybe he really means it, who knows?

Basically he get gets paid to be pro- Klitschko, doesnt get **** for telling the truth. SO I tend to belive the negative things.


Good article.

[$partacus]

And when said haters only agree with the parts that fit their agenda, we can also conclude that the haters are full of ****

Since when do people ever agree about everything? Do you agree with everything Steward says in this interview?