the "learn about froch" thread

[Shattered Jaw]

shade darker's logic: Dirrell is slick and black therefore he must have beaten Froch.

[The_Demon]

Idiots in this thread need to learn how to score a fight,being blinded by their bias

[o0P4PBOXING0o]

Dirrell schooled Froch. Froch is not even on Dirrells level. Froch is skilled as Gatti but he always get the decision

Dirrell ran for most of the fight when he should have been boxing and trying to win, He ran so much it was ridiculous. Don't get me wrong he has skills but he just doesn't have the mentality of a fighter. He was so scared of Froch, he was constantly over without being touched. That's what I call a *****, Froch may have been outboxed in parts but he spent the whole fight trying to chase a guy who was running away. There's a difference between ring generalship/defence and what Dirrell was doing. You can't win a fight doing that. Dirrell ran like the devil was chasing him while Froch was pressing the action almost every round and landing despite Dirrell's running. As for Froch not being on his level that's just a ridiculous statement because like it or not Froch beat him, Moan all you want but its in the record books and isn't going to change. Even Dirrell's corner told him he needed a knockout to win before the 12th and final round but instead of going all out for the win he opted to continue to run away and allowed Froch to easily win the 12th round.

[shade darkar]

Well it's a good assumption that in a 12 round world title fight at least 400 punches were thrown and by each boxer so you were implicitly constraining Froch's connect percentage at less than ~12%. Which is nonsense.

you can insinuate whatever you want. you talked percentages, not me, you. and i would be surprised if froch did land 12%

wake up man, did you see the amount of air he was hitting.

[shade darkar]

shade darker's logic: Dirrell is slick and black therefore he must have beaten Froch.

you a little bit pissed off? its not my fault if your fcukin blind. my logic is froch landed fcuk all, dirrell landed a hell of alot more. simples.

[Shattered Jaw]

you can insinuate whatever you wank. you talked percentages, not me, you. and i would be surprised if froch did land 12%

wake up man, did you see the amount of air he was hitting.

I have no idea how to response to this post. Firstly, you talk about wanking and then say you would be suprised if Froch landed around 1 in 10 of his punches?

I suggest going to the opticians good sir.... All that wanking is making you so blind you think Dirrell won!

[shade darkar]

Dirrell ran for most of the fight when he should have been boxing and trying to win, He ran so much it was ridiculous. Don't get me wrong he has skills but he just doesn't have the mentality of a fighter. He was so scared of Froch, he was constantly over without being touched. That's what I call a *****, Froch may have been outboxed in parts but he spent the whole fight trying to chase a guy who was running away. There's a difference between ring generalship/defence and what Dirrell was doing. You can't win a fight doing that. Dirrell ran like the devil was chasing him while Froch was pressing the action almost every round and landing despite Dirrell's running. As for Froch not being on his level that's just a ridiculous statement because like it or not Froch beat him, Moan all you want but its in the record books and isn't going to change. Even Dirrell's corner told him he needed a knockout to win before the 12th and final round but instead of going all out for the win he opted to continue to run away and allowed Froch to easily win the 12th round.

boxing is to hit and not get hit. dirrell was constantly running, but he was still landing more shots than froch. i never knew you get to keep a title for beating the fcuk out of some air.

[shade darkar]

I have no idea how to response to this post. Firstly, you talk about wanking and then say you would be suprised if Froch landed around 1 in 10 of his punches?

I suggest going to the opticians good sir.... All that wanking is making you so blind you think Dirrell won!

yeah that was a spelling mistake, i corrected it! you dont win a fight if you dont hit your target. as i said earlier in the thread, somebody show me froch landing more than 50 punches in the 12 rounds. im still waiting.

[Shattered Jaw]

you a little bit pissed off? its not my fault if your fcukin blind. my logic is froch landed fcuk all, dirrell landed a hell of alot more. simples.

Shade_darkar's Froch Dirrell score card:

Froch Dirrell
--9------10--
--9------10--
--9------10--
--9------10--
--9------10--
--9------10--
--9------10--
--8------10-- (Froch loses a point for hurting Dirrell with the best punch of the fight)
--9------10--
--8------10-- (Froch loses a point for Dirrell's holding)
--9------10--
--9------10--

[shade darkar]

Shade_darkar's Froch Dirrell score card:

Froch Dirrell
--9------10--
--9------10--
--9------10--
--9------10--
--9------10--
--9------10--
--9------10--
--8------10-- (Froch loses a point for hurting Dirrell with the best punch of the fight)
--9------10--
--8------10-- (Froch loses a point for Dirrell's holding)
--9------10--
--9------10--

grow up you tool. i take it you cant prove me wrong then about the 50 punches.