the "learn about froch" thread

[o0P4PBOXING0o]

I have no idea how to response to this post. Firstly, you talk about wanking and then say you would be suprised if Froch landed around 1 in 10 of his punches?

I suggest going to the opticians good sir.... All that wanking is making you so blind you think Dirrell won!

Hahahahahahaha! Green K.

Froch clearly won the fight. I don't know how a judge could have Dirrell winning. You can't score points for running can you? Some idiots need to watch the fight again and/ face reality. No matter how much you complain the result wont change. So stop bitching about old news

[shade darkar]

Hahahahahahaha! Green K.

Froch clearly won the fight. I don't know how a judge could have Dirrell winning. You can't score points for running can you? Some idiots need to watch the fight again and/ face reality. No matter how much you complain the result wont change. So stop bitching about old news

you must have missed all the punches dirrell landed whilst running!



oh dear, looks like your arguement just went out the window.

[Shattered Jaw]

grow up you tool. i take it you cant prove me wrong then about the 50 punches.

If I had some vague video editing skills and you paid me then I would glady prove you wrong. Until then, console yourself with this:

http://boxrec.com/list_bouts.php?hum...7570&cat=boxer

[Shattered Jaw]

you must have missed all the punches dirrell landed whilst running!



oh dear, looks like your arguement just went out the window.

Thing is - many of those punches didn't even land by Dirrell. Whoever edited must have thought, '****, actually this is not such a robbery after all, I know, I'll pad it out with a whole bunch of Dirrell punches that don't land'. I've watched the video before.

[shade darkar]

If I had some vague video editing skills and you paid me then I would glady prove you wrong. Until then, console yourself with this:

http://boxrec.com/list_bouts.php?hum...7570&cat=boxer

ah thats right, you cant prove me wrong.

[o0P4PBOXING0o]

boxing is to hit and not get hit. dirrell was constantly running, but he was still landing more shots than froch. i never knew you get to keep a title for beating the fcuk out of some air.

I'll explain to you AGAIN why Dirrell lost.

Before the 12th round, Dirrell's OWN CORNER told him he was BEHIND and NEEDED a knockout to win and he said "Okay" but instead of winning the round or even knock Froch out which he was told he NEEDED to do, he opted to RUN AWAY and refuse to even move towards Froch. Hence allowing Froch to EASILY WIN the round and the fight because Dirrell was too SCARED to even throw punches

I hope I made it clear enough for you to read.

[shade darkar]

Thing is - many of those punches didn't even land by Dirrell. Whoever edited must have thought, '****, actually this is not such a robbery after all, I know, I'll pad it out with a whole bunch of Dirrell punches that don't land'. I've watched the video before.

lol, it must be the wind snapping frochs head back ay?

[Shattered Jaw]

lol, it must be the wind snapping frochs head back ay?

Of course there were landed punches. However, the person who did the video put in plenty that didn't land. Right, I'm off now - later!

[shade darkar]

Of course there were landed punches. However, the person who did the video put in plenty that didn't land. Right, I'm off now - later!

course they did. take a trip to specsavers when you go! nice speaking with you. tata

[Hitman Hodgson]

I wish people would stfu about the Froch-Dirrell fight. You can complain about the decsion all you want but, the FACT is Froch got the decsion and won the fight. I was at the fight and at the time I thought Dirrell won the fight. But, I think there were a lot of close rounds and it was a difficult fight to score.