Floyd Mayweather dominates every single scoring criteria.

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Carpe Diem
    Seize the day
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Jan 2010
    • 16022
    • 1,232
    • 996
    • 44,413

    #11
    That's what i've been saying. Judges aren't always that credible IMO. I think that in any fights, whomever lands the more effective power punches should be the clear winner of that fight.

    Comment

    • Pullcounter
      no guts no glory
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Jan 2004
      • 42582
      • 549
      • 191
      • 49,739

      #12
      Originally posted by P4P305
      That's what i've been saying. Judges aren't always that credible IMO. I think that in any fights, whomever lands the more effective power punches should be the clear winner of that fight.
      so if pwill lands 100 effective punches on floyd xylocaine jr at a low percentage ratio and floyd lands 50 effective punches at a high percentage ratio, then pwill should win the fight?

      Comment

      • cupocity303
        Banned
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Dec 2005
        • 9604
        • 752
        • 750
        • 22,038

        #13
        Originally posted by ADDICT
        It depends on the fight, look at Clottey-Margarito. Clottey was landing more accurate punches, but Margarito broke the damn compubox record and won the fight.
        That's where RING GENERALSHIP comes to play. Did Clottey control the pace of the fight? No.

        Pac's 100 punches per round were controling it.

        Comment

        • Carpe Diem
          Seize the day
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Jan 2010
          • 16022
          • 1,232
          • 996
          • 44,413

          #14
          Originally posted by Pullcounter
          so if pwill lands 100 effective punches on floyd xylocaine jr at a low percentage ratio and floyd lands 50 effective punches at a high percentage ratio, then pwill should win the fight?
          It depends on how more effective those punches are. I don't go by the total of punches that lands because most of those punches are low percentage clean shots, i go by power shots vs power shots, and whomever wins in that category should win IMO.

          Comment

          • cupocity303
            Banned
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Dec 2005
            • 9604
            • 752
            • 750
            • 22,038

            #15
            More importantly it's a gut thing.

            Many times, judges have short term memory so what you do in the last minute overrides what you did in the first 2.

            I liked Teddy Atlas's Bar-o-meter that he used on FNF once, where he would update minute-by-minute on who is leading the round during the 3 minture span, meaning who is being more effective with what they're doing.

            Comment

            • icebergisonfire
              Interim Champion
              Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
              • Dec 2009
              • 765
              • 50
              • 2
              • 7,162

              #16
              Originally posted by Shazam!
              We all know Mayweather's case. And he would be a slight favourite if he fought Pacquiao. But he's never been tested by anyone in Manny's league yet.

              How about posting the same stats for Pacquiao?
              He was the favorite on every ******** site when we thought that the fight was going to happen.

              Comment

              • krispy kreme
                Fiendin for toilet water
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • Feb 2008
                • 10832
                • 358
                • 898
                • 18,913

                #17
                Originally posted by cupocity303
                That's where RING GENERALSHIP comes to play. Did Clottey control the pace of the fight? No.

                Pac's 100 punches per round were controling it.
                I am not talking about Ring generalship, in fact my comment was directed towards boxing in general. I was just giving an example of Margarito-Clottey, not Pac-Clottey.

                Comment

                • Jim Tom
                  Perfection Personified
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Mar 2010
                  • 5301
                  • 392
                  • 103
                  • 42,237

                  #18
                  Originally posted by Counter Punch
                  It's why he is the absolute best boxer on Earth. This is what judges look for:

                  "Effective" Aggression

                  Key word being effective. Having a high punch output is all fine and dandy but if it's not being effective what's the use? When Mayweather throws, he lands. He is the most accurate boxer in compubox history.

                  Defense

                  This speaks for itself

                  Ring Generalship

                  Mayweather controls the pace of every single one of his fights.

                  Clean and Hard Punching



                  As you can see here, Mayweather's connected power punches on average is almost double that of his opponents. His connect percentage of power punches is almost 2.5 x more than his opponents.



                  Floyd Mayweather will never lose.

                  Mayweather's the best fighter out there

                  Comment

                  • cupocity303
                    Banned
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Dec 2005
                    • 9604
                    • 752
                    • 750
                    • 22,038

                    #19
                    Originally posted by P4P305
                    It depends on how more effective those punches are. I don't go by the total of punches that lands because most of those punches are low percentage clean shots, i go by power shots vs power shots, and whomever wins in that category should win IMO.
                    How about this?

                    Lets go round by round and what's being thrown/landed in that particular round.

                    By your logic, a fighter could land all the clean power shots in the first 4 rounds and do nothing in the next 8 rounds and win the fight IF the total punches landed are in his favor.
                    Last edited by cupocity303; 04-16-2010, 03:13 PM.

                    Comment

                    • Carpe Diem
                      Seize the day
                      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                      • Jan 2010
                      • 16022
                      • 1,232
                      • 996
                      • 44,413

                      #20
                      Originally posted by cupocity303
                      How about this?

                      I'll go round by round and what's being thrown/landed in that particular round.
                      Oh well. Isn't that the whole point anyway, to land more punches than your opponent(s)? At the same time, i think that the Pacquiao vs fight is a great example that you can win a fight base on activity alone if your opponent doesn't thrown that many punches. I don't care how useless some people thinks compubox punch stat is, but it can really makes a difference on how to score a fight. Let say if you land 290 punches, while you opponents lands 295 or 300, i think whomever win in the power punches vs power punches category should win regardless of whom lands more total punches.
                      Last edited by Carpe Diem; 04-16-2010, 03:21 PM.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP