Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Mosley: "After I beat Floyd, I wouldn't require OST to fight Pacquiao"
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by Dominicano Soy! View PostSo Mosley says that OSDT is good for Boxing and every other sport should go through this, then on the other hand he goes off to say this? The more I want Mayweather to win; it's for the better. Mosley really did come off as a hypocrite here.
When will you *****s understand that Mosley accept OST for a paycheck and not to clean up the sport..
Only one who wants OST is Floyd and he only doing it to play mind games with Pac..
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dominicano Soy! View PostSo Mosley says that OSDT is good for Boxing and every other sport should go through this, then on the other hand he goes off to say this? The more I want Mayweather to win; it's for the better. Mosley really did come off as a hypocrite here.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Gutz View PostWhen will you *****s understand that Mosley accept OST for a paycheck and not to clean up the sport..
Only one who wants OST is Floyd and he only doing it to play mind games with Pac..
Comment
-
Originally posted by Jack Ruby View PostNobody wants to see that.
Once Mayweather loses, its over for him. Even though Castillo already beat him.
Originally posted by BonJovi Rulez View Postthat's a true warrior there. Not some fraud who calls a fighter one dimensional then proceeds to demand all sorts of crap
what's funny, is that shane said in 24/7, the OST thing is good for the sport....
i guess, given the chance to cash another check on his way out the door, that doesn't matter.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by O.S.I.R.I.S View PostWell then you have to call GBP, Gary Shaw, Paulie Malignaggi, Kermit Cintron and others hyprocrites because they all said OST was good for the sport but have yet to implement them in their fights. Just something to think about.......
Shane saying that he won't require Pac thru OST when he fights him kinda tainted GBP's stand on OST for their fighters.
The clincher is, is Shane speaking as a lone boxer (for himself), or he speaking as a co-staker for GBP?
Either way it's win-win for him anyways, but not good for his previous statements on OST and his BALCO scandals.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Tamis_Siensya View PostThere's a bigger puzzle mate.
Shane saying that he won't require Pac thru OST when he fights him kinda tainted GBP's stand on OST for their fighters.
The clincher is, is Shane speaking as a lone boxer (for himself), or he speaking as a co-staker for GBP?
Either way it's win-win for him anyways, but not good for his previous statements on OST and his BALCO scandals.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Tamis_Siensya View PostThere's a bigger puzzle mate.
Shane saying that he won't require Pac thru OST when he fights him kinda tainted GBP's stand on OST for their fighters.
The clincher is, is Shane speaking as a lone boxer (for himself), or he speaking as a co-staker for GBP?
Either way it's win-win for him anyways, but not good for his previous statements on OST and his BALCO scandals.
BTW You gotta love the Irony in that.....
Comment
Comment