Naazim is using wrong tactics for this fight

[JM1]

Mosley's targeting Floyd Mayweather's heart,most of his shots will be aimed around the chest area nearer to the heart.Watch Shane's footage,see where Naazim has the pad for Shane to hit,that's the targeted area.That worked with Margarito but it will not work with Mayweather.This is the reason Naazim says Floyd will fold after the 5th round.He wants to put pressure on that area like he did with Margarito.

I've seen Mayweather training and the two gloves are covering that area well so Mayweather's already anticipating that move.What makes Shane more vulnerable is that he cant move his head well.This is why Shane has a problem with boxers.He's been working on his hand speed which is great but he will be getting destroyed in this fight.His handspeed will not be enough because he doesnt have a jab.

When it's all done Shane will be Floyd's target practice,Floyd wont miss a shot and his accuracy will be a record high

that could be possible but we wont know til we see the results. plus, i dont have the guts to question brother ****m's wisdom. i respect him too much

[swizz]

Not really.

It's not wrong tactics when you know Floyd will shell up in close quarters. ****m is getting Mosley used to striking the holes in the shoulder roll defense. That's all. So when Floyd shells up, he isn't going ******ed like every one of Mayweather's past opponents.

floyd doesnt shell up like clottey....floyd is very smart in the ring perhaps the smartest right now and i think he will use control aggression

[Jim Tom]

I guess I misread your post. Fact remains, you haven't seen enough of Mosley's camp to come to this deduction, because if you had, you wouldn't be posting about it.

I see it bothers you that I'm an analyst.It doesnt take much to be one neither do analysts get paid a lot of money.It's just a job like any other so dont choke yourself with envy.Anyone with a basic degree knows it aint difficult so if you are that bothered why not push yourself up

[tacoboxer]

I forgive your ignorance because you are always wrong and you know it.In a way I understand your level of thinking...........Ever heard of the term 'declarative learning'?

Pardon me for sounding like an idiot, but what the hell are you talking about Jak?

"forgive your ignorance"... "level of thinking"...

Let’s talk facts for a second because I'm having a difficult time understanding what your point is...

The definition of "declarative learning" is simply this: acquiring information that one can speak about ie: learning the capital of a state is a declarative piece of information (thank you wikipedia...)

I know the capital of California is Sacramento but in no way does that qualify me as an analyst on the State of California or Sacramento for that matter.

We all analyze fights we watch but that doesn't make us boxing analysts... we merely form opinions that seem right to us.

If you have some professional analyst credentials for work you've done then thats all well and good (how are we to say any different if you say you are truly a boxing analyst...)

I guess it seems a bit weird that you degrade the people that respond to your blog.....(I just can't see Jim Nance responding in such a manner if I disagreed with opinions he posted on a blog about Phil or Tiger at the Masters).

If you can please send links to work that you've done and I will sincerely begin to follow your work....

[Jim Tom]

Pardon me for sounding like an idiot, but what the hell are you talking about Jak?

"forgive your ignorance"... "level of thinking"...

Let’s talk facts for a second because I'm having a difficult time understanding what your point is...

The definition of "declarative learning" is simply this: acquiring information that one can speak about ie: learning the capital of a state is a declarative piece of information (thank you wikipedia...)

I know the capital of California is Sacramento but in no way does that qualify me as an analyst on the State of California or Sacramento for that matter.

We all analyze fights we watch but that doesn't make us boxing analysts... we merely form opinions that seem right to us.

If you have some professional analyst credentials for work you've done then thats all well and good (how are we to say any different if you say you are truly a boxing analyst...)

I guess it seems a bit weird that you degrade the people that respond to your blog.....(I just can't see Jim Nance responding in such a manner if I disagreed with opinions he posted on a blog about Phil or Tiger at the Masters).

If you can please send links to work that you've done and I will sincerely begin to follow your work....

The definition of declarative learning is quite clear.knowledge you can talk about is not the same as doing.You can know so much about horse riding,the history and be able to analyse but riding horses is different thing.The point was to show the guy who said [I] couldnt talk about boxing because [I]'m not a trainer or I cant comment on Naazim's shortcomings because I'm not a trainer.I know about and that qualifies me to talk,it's a different skill.Someone said I should go and train then someone said if I knew I would train.This was when I had to show people that there are 2 ways of learning and I brought the declarative learning into the equation.

Your Sacramento example is not relevant in Declarative learning.The knowing what bit is the actual doing.

I'm not putting down everyone.If you notice those who came to discuss tactics I had no issues with.I only responded rudely to those who started by name calling.If you never put labels on me then I never messed up with you.This forum however is full of rubbish people,I do understand they are entitled to their ignorance,it's a human right but then let them not just call people names.FYI being an analyst aint a difficult thing,sometimes all you need is knowing the right people.

Regarding my work I prefer to remain anonymous on that front.I only mentioned the analyst bit because of a question that had been raised.

[BigStereotype]

Pardon me for sounding like an idiot, but what the hell are you talking about Jak?

"forgive your ignorance"... "level of thinking"...

Let’s talk facts for a second because I'm having a difficult time understanding what your point is...

The definition of "declarative learning" is simply this: acquiring information that one can speak about ie: learning the capital of a state is a declarative piece of information (thank you wikipedia...)

I know the capital of California is Sacramento but in no way does that qualify me as an analyst on the State of California or Sacramento for that matter.

We all analyze fights we watch but that doesn't make us boxing analysts... we merely form opinions that seem right to us.

If you have some professional analyst credentials for work you've done then thats all well and good (how are we to say any different if you say you are truly a boxing analyst...)

I guess it seems a bit weird that you degrade the people that respond to your blog.....(I just can't see Jim Nance responding in such a manner if I disagreed with opinions he posted on a blog about Phil or Tiger at the Masters).

If you can please send links to work that you've done and I will sincerely begin to follow your work....

Co-signed. This guy is a ****y piece of garbage.

[Jim Tom]

Co-signed. This guy is a ****y piece of garbage.

I just happen to know who I am.If I'm ****y it was inevitable.The majority of you on here know **** yet you are quick to insult people.Dont get me wrong we have great people here too.You happen to be one of the cow dung here who rushes to conclusions without reading posts

[PensionKiller]

Mosley's targeting Floyd Mayweather's heart,most of his shots will be aimed around the chest area nearer to the heart.Watch Shane's footage,see where Naazim has the pad for Shane to hit,that's the targeted area.That worked with Margarito but it will not work with Mayweather.This is the reason Naazim says Floyd will fold after the 5th round.He wants to put pressure on that area like he did with Margarito.

I've seen Mayweather training and the two gloves are covering that area well so Mayweather's already anticipating that move.What makes Shane more vulnerable is that he cant move his head well.This is why Shane has a problem with boxers.He's been working on his hand speed which is great but he will be getting destroyed in this fight.His handspeed will not be enough because he doesnt have a jab.

When it's all done Shane will be Floyd's target practice,Floyd wont miss a shot and his accuracy will be a record high

That area may be a bluff.

Floyd is fast, and his reflexes are real damn good and his eyesight is the best, but if Mosely still has 90% of what he did, he can hit the head and the chest.

[BigStereotype]

I just happen to know who I am.If I'm ****y it was inevitable.The majority of you on here know **** yet you are quick to insult people.Dont get me wrong we have great people here too.You happen to be one of the cow dung here who rushes to conclusions without reading posts

You're delusional. Just because you watch boxing does not mean you can come up with a better gameplan than a master like Brother ****m. You're self-important and a douchebag. **** you and your ******, condescending bull**** posts.

[tacoboxer]

So the problem is in how we define terms.....

FYI being an analyst aint a difficult thing,sometimes all you need is knowing the right people.

Regarding my work I prefer to remain anonymous on that front.I only mentioned that because of a question that had been raised.

Fair enough.... but here is where we will have to agree to disagree...

All analysts have opinions...

All people with opinions can't be considered analysts...

I'm going on record that in my opinion you are either the worlds worst analyst or the worlds greatest anonymous analyst... I can't figure out which!!

By the way if I wanted to become an anonymous analyst.... what should I expect to earn? (forget I asked that question ...... I'd rather never hear from you again).