Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Haye's Team Fire Back at Klitschko, Talks To Begin

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    This fight better get made.

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by Six Shooter View Post
      Same thing can be said about the Klitschko's rematch clauses, if they were so confident why do they need a fight me/fight my brother rematch clause?

      He knew that it was a risky fight to take and his career would pretty much be finished if he lost and the Klitschko's offer was for peanuts. When a better offer came along where he can make millions for a few fights before facing the brothers and getting a much bigger share he would have been a fool to turn it down.
      Rematch clauses against the champion are the norm, and Wlad is the champion. The fight against Vitali ensured that whoever won would be the undisputed HW champion.

      He took the WBA route because he knew he would get KOed if he faced the Klitschkos, and he wanted to make some money facing the WBA circle-jerk before that happened. Yet Haye said after the Ruiz fight he didn't want to fight the Klitschkos for money, what an hypocrite

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by lfc19titles View Post
        I hate all this trash talking between the two sets of fans. look we know they both want to fight each other but for fights to get made you need a good contract for both and free time.

        Haye is in dogs **** at the moment because of that re match clause, he may not have a choice but to fight valuev. they both want to get it on so lets wait and stop theis ****** ducking ****e because we know in our hearts nobody is ducking anyone.

        contracts make fights, if setanta didnt go bust in the uk the fight would have happened but it did go bust and sky offered a ****e deal to haye

        sky tries its best to rip off fighters, look at khan, he is about to go to itv because sky is again messing them about.
        good post

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by Pirao View Post
          The WBA better? You mean the organization that strips their fighters to give the belts to whoever fits their agenda, who has the worst HW rankings, and that is actually a division withing a division since it's always the same guys fighting against each other? I know you are a Haye fan but that statement is ludicrous.

          Plus, Wlad has the RING belt. RING belt>>>Alphabet belts.
          Hey, Wlad is the better fighter and more belts than Haye.

          The ring belt is also the best, however I'd always say Vitali beats him.

          Vitali should get the shot and then 2 bro's with have 2 alphabet belts.

          WBA by name is better I mean. TBH allt he rankings are ****ed up for every organisation bro.

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by Pirao View Post
            Rematch clauses against the champion are the norm, and Wlad is the champion. The fight against Vitali ensured that whoever won would be the undisputed HW champion.

            He took the WBA route because he knew he would get KOed if he faced the Klitschkos, and he wanted to make some money facing the WBA circle-jerk before that happened. Yet Haye said after the Ruiz fight he didn't want to fight the Klitschkos for money, what an hypocrite
            Vitali said he didn't care about money when he faced LL he just wanted the fight, but he turned down an offer from LL a few months before. All boxers lie when they say that.

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by Six Shooter View Post
              Vitali said he didn't care about money when he faced LL he just wanted the fight, but he turned down an offer from LL a few months before. All boxers lie when they say that.
              Vitali did fight LL though, has Haye fought the Klitschkos?

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by Pirao View Post
                Vitali did fight LL though, has Haye fought the Klitschkos?
                He will, no doubt about that in my mind.

                Comment


                • #38
                  Does someone know what has happened with the negociations to defend against povetkin i want to know !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by Six Shooter View Post
                    He will, no doubt about that in my mind.
                    Plenty of doubt in my mind. Did Vitali sign a contract to fight Lewis and then pull out like Haye did, too?

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by Pirao View Post
                      Rematch clauses against the champion are the norm, and Wlad is the champion. The fight against Vitali ensured that whoever won would be the undisputed HW champion.

                      He took the WBA route because he knew he would get KOed if he faced the Klitschkos, and he wanted to make some money facing the WBA circle-jerk before that happened. Yet Haye said after the Ruiz fight he didn't want to fight the Klitschkos for money, what an hypocrite
                      you just tooled yourself, valuev was champion hence rematch clause, just like LL and rahman. the decision is really in valuev's hands not haye. Haye can't really do squat until valuev decided what he is doing.

                      Your point about haye making more agaisnt the klits (original offers) than valuev is utter bull**** too. Haye/valuev made 1 million ppv in the u/k at 15 quid a pop. I don't the exact cut haye made from each ppv, but it dwarfs anything they two cheap bazzas offered.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP