i think floyd beats pac, so why insist on the random drug testing?

[S.G.]

just becuz pac refused doesnt mean he's guilty. i woulda refused too. lets say at my job, we've never had drug testing. then my boss said he wanted to drug test me and me only, nobody else at, i'd say no even though id have nothing to hide. i'd be insulted. its a matter of principle. i think pac had every right to refuse, especially the way floyd went about it.

Were you just about to fight your boss? Or compete with him in some way? Did he have reason to suspect you? Would you be rewarded with a gigantic bonus and career opportunity for partaking in the tests?

Also, boxing and an office job are two very different things with different ways of operating. I'm sorry but I've heard that analogy on here a few times and it sucks.

[SteveJarvey]

I will say that as a Pac fan I believe Floyd beats Pac with/without PEDS. I am not against OSTs but I believe Pac is clean and has the right to say no.

Nice sig. Decribes the *****s to perfection lol!

[guru]

Were you just about to fight your boss? Or compete with him in some way? Did he have reason to suspect you? Would you be rewarded with a gigantic bonus and career opportunity for partaking in the tests?

Also, boxing and an office job are two very different things with different ways of operating. I'm sorry but I've heard that analogy on here a few times and it sucks.

i'm just usin as an example to say i can see where pac would find it insulting and disrespectful. pac trains hard, give 100% to be the best he can be, then gets accused of cheating.

i side with pac for refusing to do something nobody else has ever had to do. and on floyds side, pac agreed to testing immediately after and before, thats not enough to satisfy him? why?

[Dirt]

- floyd loves money and only fights for that.
- floyds biggest payday would be vs. Pac.
- floyd called pacquiao 1 dimensional and would be easy money, easy work.


So he would makes tons of money for someone he knows he can beat, yet there is no fight.




















Because he knows in his heart and mind pac has the same chance of beating him as he does beating pac.

[Imhotep]

this is from a totaly unbiased point of view. i think floyd beats pac by a close UD. but i dont understand demanding that pac do something NOBODY else has had to do before. if i were pac, i'd say no too.

i can understand wanting shane to take random tests, he's been caught taking peds. but pac hasnt. floyd is not bigger than boxing, if he has an issue with their procedures and feels that they are not adequate then take it up with them, not pac.

like i said, i think floyd beats pac. the only guy i'd pick to beat floyd is pwill. so i really dont understand why he doesnt just drop the random drug testing. having the fight fall apart becuz of this issue, i think is floyds fault.

Would you fight somebody you think might be on roids?Would`nt you want to make sure the guy you fighting is not cheating?


You just a bias *******.

[guru]

Would you fight somebody you think might be on roids?Would`nt you want to make sure the guy you fighting is not cheating?


You just a bias *******.

1 - how can be a ******* if i'd pick floyd to win?
2 - isnt testing b4 and immediately after the fight enough? isnt the testing the boxing commision has been doin for years enough? if its not, why not take it up with them instead of pac?

[S.G.]

i'm just usin as an example to say i can see where pac would find it insulting and disrespectful. pac trains hard, give 100% to be the best he can be, then gets accused of cheating.

Athletes ****ed it up for themselves. Whether an individual is clean or not he can't just refuse testing in this day and age after everything that's happened and still is happening. The fact is, there are question marks over all athletes now. Refusing to take better tests that actually have a chance of catching you or stopping you from cheating only serves to harm your image, and rightly so.

i side with pac for refusing to do something nobody else has ever had to do.

That's not true. Lots of athletes and even boxers have been subjected to better testing regimes. Just none that you care about I guess.

and on floyds side, pac agreed to testing immediately after and before, thats not enough to satisfy him? why?

He asked for an inch and Pacquiao offered him a millimeter. Urine tests on the day of the fight and after the fight will confirm whether or not Pacquiao has urine detectable PEDs in his system during the fight, okay. But what about PEDs that are only detectable through blood? What about the possibility of him using PEDs during his training camp (when it is in fact most likely he'd be juicing if he was)?

[Dirt]

Would you fight somebody you think might be on roids?Would`nt you want to make sure the guy you fighting is not cheating?


You just a bias *******.

even after mayweather accused pac of roids he still called him 1 dimensional and easy work.

but yeah, we all know floyds genuinely wants to clean the sport up.

[Seleção No. 13]

Anyone who believes Floyd wanted "to clean the sport up" is a moron.

[S.G.]

even after mayweather accused pac of roids he still called him 1 dimensional and easy work.

but yeah, we all know floyds genuinely wants to clean the sport up.

Mayweather doesn't give a **** about cleaning the sport up--anyone with any sense can see this--but his little stand is still beneficial to the sport regardless of his intentions.