Is there any Floyd fans who don't agree with testing, or any Pacquiao fans who do?
Collapse
-
Comment
-
The first few lines of your post, reasons in favour of the testing makes sense. The rest is just based on opinions and statistics that don't exist, sounds a bit too like a ******* making excuses to validate the refusal for my liking. Not calling you a ******* or anything, you ain't made enough posts for me to know which side you stand on. Just saying. That's what it sounds like.Comment
-
the first few lines of your post, reasons in favour of the testing makes sense. The rest is just based on opinions and statistics that don't exist, sounds a bit too like a ******* making excuses to validate the refusal for my liking. Not calling you a ******* or anything, you ain't made enough posts for me to know which side you stand on. Just saying. That's what it sounds like.
yes i am making my opinions base off of science and common knowledge/ and common sense because i want to see the fight and all this bloodtesting nonesense is bad 4pac's training, mind me i will say mayweather too because he's also a boxer
, this fetish for an unnecassary bloodtest is the sole barrier for the fight not happening, if only because *****s distract the facts away of why its not needed at all in the first and self-proclaim boxing fans like you refuse to google and enlighten themselves on opinions and "statistics" that somehow dont exist WHEN THEY DO
we can still have a credible test that detects all known performance enhancing drugs(hgh is not one) and have the fight AND THATS WHERE I STAND, IF IT SUPPORTS PACQUIAO SO BE IT BUT IT DOESNT TAKE AWAY THE FACT WHAT I SAY IS TRUELast edited by floda3rd; 04-12-2010, 07:01 AM.Comment
-
14 days isnt an issue. arum is the issue, he isnt sure his man can beat floyd and wants to make the most money out of pac possible so he killed the fight.Comment
-
Comment
-
so what? That's a given when theyre in the ring, most will get cut for sure and they will bleed but under no circumstances should you take away the privilege of a boxer to be fully prepared in training to be able to handle themselves properly in the ring on fight night, a prepared boxer in the ring will handle himself better even if he bleeds than a half prepared boxer.. logicLast edited by floda3rd; 04-12-2010, 07:14 AM.Comment
-
so what? That's a given when theyre in the ring, most will get cut for sure and they will bleed but under no circumstances should you take away the privilege of a boxer to be fully prepared in training to be able to handle themselves properly in the ring on fight night, a prepared man in the ring will handle himself better even if he bleeds than a half prepared one.. logicComment
Comment