Is Floyd above the NSAC?

[Eaner0919]

actually I stand corrected.

apologies I do get **** wrong sometimes

[Vasyl’s dad]

When did I say in tht post or any post overall that they shouldn't share, I really don't care one way or the other because if either comes up positive USADA will out them right then and there then NSAC would know anyways, but if they want to go over the results themself so be it whatever.

NSAC is not always correct and as a resident of that state Floyd pretty much has the right to call them out since he pays for them to be in business as they are a government agency, state athletic commissions are not above reproach and can do things incorrect plus if they don't get called out on issue how could they ever improve since government agency are not known for their flexibility and forward mindedness.

Now run along as I still see no reason for us to converse.

So what are you crying for then?

I'm addressing people who have a problem with the information being shared and questioning why the NSAC needs/wants to see it.

You fall into that category.


You want the sport to be cleaner, so you say,


but when things are done to do so,

now you guys have a problem with it because Floyd is somehow involved.


This sharing of information is for the betterment of the sport.

You guys act like they are hiding information, not trying to gather it.

[Vasyl’s dad]

What steps are they taking to make the sport clean?

Well, it looks here like they're gathering information.

You have to start somewhere.

Not you, or anyone else can state why the sharing of information is a bad thing.

[The Gambler1981]

actually I stand corrected.

apologies I do get **** wrong sometimes

I was about to say but what you said makes sence because to work out this issue at it currently stands it will either take one sides being the bigger man (unlikely) or some kind of compromise that does not come from either party (and both sides gain something).

I find it unlikely that it is NSAC that does it though because once they open that box they have to do that for all fights or atleast have the option if someone wants it, because they could get sued since they have to provide equally for everyone not just big money fighters.

It is a messed up situation that is not easily solved it will require creative thinkig to make a deal between them.

[IMDAZED]

Well, it looks here like they're gathering information.

You have to start somewhere.

Not you, or anyone else can state why the sharing of information is a bad thing.

Who said it was a bad thing? Again, what is the NSAC doing to clean up the sport? Aside from having the USADA do it for them and then reading the results?

[Ray*]

I see people crying because the NSAC is taking steps to make the sport cleaner.

Thats what they wanted, now they're starting to get it,

and they're still pissed.

Whether the NSAC acts "high and mighty" as you say has no bearing on what should be done for the good of the sport.

Its funny though, when Floyd says it needs to be done, its a great thing,

but as soon as the NSAC acts on it,

they're "high and mighty".

What exactly do you clowns want?

The fight is in the state that the NSAC commissions. There isn't any reason for them to not have that info.

You dudes are acting as if they are somehow doing something bad.

Why?

I dont think you get anything that has been put forward to you so far, No one is against NSAC doing the job they were suppose to be doing in the first place but the NSAC didnt call in the USADA or did they?

[Heru]

Get with it or get lost.

NSAC and all other commissions doing the testing is a conflict of interest, which is why third party testing is the way to go.

If they start putting on stricter testing, they will lose out on their cut from fights (especially the big ones like Pacquiao's).

[dans]

Why is it that Pacquiao fans are all the sudden all for the NSAC?

Shouldn't we want decision making to be done for the good of boxing? Since when is drug testing a bad thing? It's not. Only Pacquiao fans who side with him blindly would look away.

Take yourself out of being a fan of either fighter, and ask yourself.

Is more drug testing in boxing a good thing?

Should decisions be made based on what a commission wants or should they be based on what is the right thing?

It's simple.

Whether Floyd is a prick or not is irrelevant. Of course he's a prick. Sometimes at least. But why does that play more of a factor than what the actual issue is?

[Vasyl’s dad]

Who said it was a bad thing? Again, what is the NSAC doing to clean up the sport? Aside from having the USADA do it for them and then reading the results?

Who said it was a bad thing?

Quite a few people in this thread have given an attitude as such.



If you really want to know what they're doing,

write them. I'm not affiliated with them in any way.

I just don't see the reasoning for crying about the sharing of this information.

You guys should be happy the NSAC are interested. It shows that perhaps, maybe, just maybe they're willing to undergo some changes.


Would you allow some deals to go on in your home that you didn't know about?

I don't think so. Not if you're a man who values what goes on in your place of business.

[IMDAZED]

Who said it was a bad thing?

Quite a few people in this thread have given an attitude as such.



If you really want to know what they're doing,

write them. I'm not affiliated with them in any way.

I just don't see the reasoning for crying about the sharing of this information.

You guys should be happy the NSAC are interested. It shows that perhaps, maybe, just maybe they're willing to undergo some changes.


Would you allow some deals to go on in your home that you didn't know about?

I don't think so. Not if you're a man who values what goes on in your place of business.

I thought you said they were helping clean up the sport? Now you don't know what they do? Which is it?