Is Floyd above the NSAC?

[Vasyl’s dad]

No, I just don't understand how the NSAC are being unduly compromised by the involvement of the USADA.

The NSAC will be conducting business as usual, including their standard archaic drug testing protocol, just as they would have been if the USADA hadn't been employed by Golden Boy to provide extra-curricular drug testing.

They are also going to be kept in know by USADA (who, incidentally, are also a government funded organisation), just out of good faith.

So what are you talking about? Or are you just running in here with your big attention grabbing green text to antagonise people?--which seems to be your primary and sole motive for even posting on this site.

Uh, isn't the entire reasoning for this testing for the betterment of the sport?

If thats the case,

I don't see why you or anyone else would have a problem with any drug testing lab working with the NSAC.

Apparently, some of you do.

"oh, the NSAC should just mind its own business"
"the NSAC didn't want to do the testing themselves, they should just **** off".
"why should the NSAC want the results, they didn't care before"

Thats basically what people are saying,

that is what I find laughable about people who say they want a better, cleaner sport.

They want a better, cleaner sport,

but don't want commissions and testing agencies working together?

Thats a bit weird.


If you truly want a cleaner sport,

you should have no objections to what the NSAC wants to see.

Many of you, do.

Or just claim not to understand why.

[S.G.]

Uh, isn't the entire reasoning for this testing for the betterment of the sport?

Do you believe that?

I don't see why you or anyone else would have a problem with any drug testing lab working with the NSAC.

Apparently, some of you do.

"oh, the NSAC should just mind its own business"
"the NSAC didn't want to do the testing themselves, they should just **** off".
"why should the NSAC want the results, they didn't care before"

Thats basically what people are saying,

that is what I find laughable about people who say they want a better, cleaner sport.

They want a better, cleaner sport,

but don't want commissions and testing agencies working together?

Thats a bit weird.


If you truly want a cleaner sport,

you should have no objections to what the NSAC wants to see.

Many of you, do.

Or just claim not to understand why.

First of all, how about you do away with your straw men and address individuals and their points if you're really after any sort of reasonable conversation or debate.

Secondly, most of that nonsense you outlined is exchanged equally by a bunch of drones on different sides of the same coin.

And finally, I personally do not care whether the USADA share their results with the NSAC for the Mosley v Mayweather fight or not (which, as I've already pointed out and contrary to what Nathanielz would lead his audience to believe, they are). It's absolutely inconsiquential. If they work together or if they don't makes no difference the short or long term. State commissions aren't going to be the ones to implement more watertight anti-doping measures in the end anyway.

[jqSide]

These floyd ass kissers had better be careful in going too far in their arguments. Soon NASC will put into action the same exact testing the USADA is implementing. And since Pac already stated that he will abide by NASC rules, what will be Floyd's attempt at having control over the next negotiations? Maybe his next ducking attempt will be, aside from asking for a 60/40 split, "NASC can't be trusted!"

But...let's see.

[Vasyl’s dad]

Do you believe that?



First of all, how about you do away with your straw men and address individuals and their points if you're really after any sort of reasonable conversation or debate.

Secondly, most of that nonsense you outlined is exchanged equally by a bunch of drones on different sides of the same coin.

And finally, I personally do not care whether the USADA share their results with the NSAC for the Mosley v Mayweather fight or not (which, as I've already pointed out and contrary to what Nathanielz would lead his audience to believe, they are). It's absolutely inconsiquential. If they work together or if they don't makes no difference the short or long term. State commissions aren't going to be the ones to implement more watertight anti-doping measures in the end anyway.

If you or anyone else for that matter wants better testing to clean up the sport,

you'd be in high favor of any testing agency working with the NSAC and all other state commissions.

Thats the bottom line.

If you have to question why its important that information be shared, or outright denounce the sharing of testing results,


apparently you don't care much at all for cleaning up the sport.

So, which is it?

You're for better standards in regards to testing in boxing or not?

[sweetpea87]

The NSAC's job is to regulate the testing, Floyds job is to fight. Let the NSAC do their job and Floyd just needs to his jon of fight and win.

[jqSide]

I'm guessing that NASC is laying the groundwork for the biggest fight of the century to happen.

[IMDAZED]

If you or anyone else for that matter wants better testing to clean up the sport,

you'd be in high favor of any testing agency working with the NSAC and all other state commissions.

Thats the bottom line.

If you have to question why its important that information be shared, or outright denounce the sharing of testing results,


apparently you don't care much at all for cleaning up the sport.

So, which is it?

You're for better standards in regards to testing in boxing or not?

This makes little sense. If the commission itself is not in favor of cleaning up the sport then who cares what they think? You put it in YOUR contract and go about your business. Ask Arthur Abraham.

[Jim Tom]

The Mosley/Floyd fight is in the state of Nevada, and yet the NSAC doesn't have the results of the USDA PED testing for Floyd and Mosley.

IMHO, that is a black eye to the NSAC. A commission should know what's going on with the testing of boxers who are boxing in their jurisdiction.

Bascially, floyd is running ****, not the NSAC.

They refused to do proper blood tests and claim the tests they do is enough so why should Mayweather give them results

[The Gambler1981]

The NSAC's job is to regulate the testing, Floyds job is to fight. Let the NSAC do their job and Floyd just needs to his jon of fight and win.

I disagree it is Floyd's job to look out for his best interests (whatever he thinks they may be). If a person is not going to lookout for themself then it is easy to take advantage of them.


Floyd wass asking for better test above what the state required aslong as the state getsw what they need why should they care if there is extra testing since people in the commision have been vocal about the flaws in their testing regime.


I never knew looking out for number 1 was a bad thing~

[Vasyl’s dad]

I disagree it is Floyd's job to look out for his best interests (whatever he thinks they may be). If a person is not going to lookout for themself then it is easy to take advantage of them.


Floyd wass asking for better test above what the state required aslong as the state getsw what they need why should they care if there is extra testing since people in the commision have been vocal about the flaws in their testing regime.


I never knew looking out for number 1 was a bad thing~

Its pretty simple.

The fight is happening in their state.

What is wrong with the sharing of information if you want the sport to be cleaner?

I would think for those that claim they want the sport cleaned up, and at the same time claim the NSAC is incompetent because of their standards,

they would be loving that drug testing agencies are willing to share information and at the same time, educate the commissions on how to do a better job.

Isn't that what this is about in the first place?

Cleaning up the sport.

So, why are you guys against it?