Berto asked for a Rematch Clause, for the Fight to be Made

[SoldierWarrior]

Because pay isn't determined based on how close a fight is.

It should be, this sport is suppose to be about honor.

[-Antonio-]

What's wrong with rematch clauses? When a guy wins a fight clearly that doesn't call for a rematch and instead of going on to bigger and better fights is forced to settle for a rematch anyway. Then that fighter loses and misses out on a lot of money he could have made.

That fighter is Carlos Quintana.

[-GDS-]

Berto beat Collazo clearly.

Holy crap. I thought I was the only one who saw that.

[Mr. Fantastic]

Only reason its wrong is cause its being done to a PR. That's why Ch@mp is going all emo.

[B.U.R.N.E.R]

Rematch for the hell of it are Bull****, IMO.


Lets say Berto gets Shiut Out 12-0, WHy would that deserve aaaa rematch!

Because he is the WW WBC Champion of the World?

[-Antonio-]

You must have forgotten about the last time Quintana fought at WW.

He was knocked out by a guy he already clearly beat putting his career in limbo for two years.

All because of a rematch clause.

[Ch@mpBox@PR]

Because he is the WW WBC Champion of the World?

Thats Bull****!!! Floyd is asking for a remath and Mosley is the champ.

I think predetermined rematches are bull****.


Like what happed with Dawson vs Tarver.


I think rematches should be determned after a fight, not before. Much less imediate rematches!

[-GDS-]

He was knocked out by a guy he already clearly beat putting his career in limbo for two years.

All because of a rematch clause.

His career was in limbo because of a half hearted attempt at 154. He's a careeer welter, and now he's getting a welter title shot.

[Calilloyd]

Rematch for the hell of it are Bull****, IMO.


Lets say Berto gets Shiut Out 12-0, WHy would that deserve aaaa rematch!

Not going to happen. So you don't have to worry about that.

[Don Johnson]

Berto beat Collazo clearly.

what fight were you watching?