Mayweather is a better verison of prime RJJ?

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • SkillspayBills
    Garlic Butter Gang!
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Aug 2007
    • 29181
    • 2,155
    • 3,739
    • 61,188

    #31
    Noone is more talented than Prime Roy. Noone. Plus their styles are so different it is hard to compare the two.

    Comment

    • jayweather sr
      Up and Comer
      Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
      • Apr 2010
      • 51
      • 0
      • 0
      • 6,074

      #32
      Originally posted by photomane
      Agree/disagree?
      completely different. rjj taunted his opponents a lot. he had a better offense.

      rjj has the style that would make him significantly weaker with age. mayweathers style can possibly make him an elite fighter way past his prime.

      Comment

      • SplitSecond
        Undisputed Champion
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Nov 2009
        • 23151
        • 1,715
        • 1,187
        • 85,044

        #33
        roy jones was/is faster, hits harder, and in his prime was just on a whole nother level

        Comment

        • IMDAZED
          Fair but Firm
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • May 2006
          • 42644
          • 1,134
          • 1,770
          • 67,152

          #34
          Originally posted by jayweather sr
          completely different. rjj taunted his opponents a lot. he had a better offense.

          rjj has the style that would make him significantly weaker with age. mayweathers style can possibly make him an elite fighter way past his prime.
          I don't understand comments like this. EVERYONE gets weaker with age. Roy Jones was 35 when he lost. Most fighters are finished by then. And most of them don't already have 50 fights, titles in multiple divisions, etc.

          Comment

          • AKATheMack
            Unreasonably Logical
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Nov 2004
            • 11155
            • 430
            • 285
            • 19,179

            #35
            Originally posted by Kilrain
            Totally different. Roy relied on his reflexes, footwork and handspeed to beat people. He was unconventional. Barely threw jabs. Leaping, whipping left hooks and lead right hands. Excellent hand and footspeed. Mayweather's more conventional. Excellent defence, offence, right hand, jab, chin, speed. Plus the reflexes of Roy.
            Not even close to the same reflexes as Prime Roy. Not even close.
            Originally posted by j.one
            Disagree two of My favs here and there nothing alike, Floyd is almost like Jones talent with Hopkins skill and patience, actually more he is more skilled and smarter than B-Hop. Floyd is his own thing really he is special.
            Again not even close. Floyd is a great fighter and he definitely has athletic ability, but he relies more on the technical side to enhance his athletic ability where Roy Jones did whatever he wanted to do and the hell with being technical.

            Comment

            • jayweather sr
              Up and Comer
              Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
              • Apr 2010
              • 51
              • 0
              • 0
              • 6,074

              #36
              Originally posted by IMDAZED
              I don't understand comments like this. EVERYONE gets weaker with age. Roy Jones was 35 when he lost. Most fighters are finished by then. And most of them don't already have 50 fights, titles in multiple divisions, etc.
              yeah most people get weaker by age, but what i meant was mayweather has the style that would make him at least competitive with the elite way past his prime.

              kinda like hopkins. sorry for my bad wording.
              Last edited by jayweather sr; 04-06-2010, 06:01 PM.

              Comment

              • Dan...
                Fredette About It
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Jun 2008
                • 7675
                • 454
                • 951
                • 19,200

                #37
                Originally posted by IMDAZED
                I don't understand comments like this. EVERYONE gets weaker with age. Roy Jones was 35 when he lost. Most fighters are finished by then. And most of them don't already have 50 fights, titles in multiple divisions, etc.
                It always makes me laugh. When people talk about Roy's decline its almost like they think he was at the top for 3 years and had a little run there, before being "exposed".

                They seem to fail to realise that he was at retirement age before he was legitimately defeated, after a 15 year career, most of which was spent at the top of the sport.

                Comment

                • Tuggers1986
                  Yo Momma Loves Gravy
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Dec 2006
                  • 7898
                  • 593
                  • 1,692
                  • 18,314

                  #38
                  Disagree.

                  They are COMPLETELY different.

                  Jones relied on his athletic ability where as Mayweather relies on his technical ability

                  Comment

                  • -MAKAVELLI-
                    Banned
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Aug 2008
                    • 50080
                    • 3,580
                    • 2,792
                    • 169,000

                    #39
                    Originally posted by Dan...
                    It always makes me laugh. When people talk about Roy's decline its almost like they think he was at the top for 3 years and had a little run there, before being "exposed".

                    They seem to fail to realise that he was at retirement age before he was legitimately defeated, after a 15 year career, most of which was spent at the top of the sport.



                    there was a time during Roy's peak where he didnt even lose a round...some of the comments here are funny

                    Comment

                    • Tuggers1986
                      Yo Momma Loves Gravy
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • Dec 2006
                      • 7898
                      • 593
                      • 1,692
                      • 18,314

                      #40
                      Originally posted by Dan...
                      It always makes me laugh. When people talk about Roy's decline its almost like they think he was at the top for 3 years and had a little run there, before being "exposed".

                      They seem to fail to realise that he was at retirement age before he was legitimately defeated, after a 15 year career, most of which was spent at the top of the sport.
                      EXACTLY!!!

                      Some guy the other day said Roy got exposed. He never got exposed, he got OLD!!

                      How does somebody at the top of the sport for nearly 15 years and the only living human to hold the Middleweight AND Heavyweight belt get exposed??!!!

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP