Video: ESPN's #1 greatest KO ever. No different then Abraham-Dirrell

[xAUGUSTUSx]

Yea, what you said. Not sure how the TS thinks the punches are close at all.

I'm talking about the punch after they were down. It was clearly dirty. So just because the knee's were'nt down it's ok. One of Walcott's arms were slumped over the ropes and he was out cold but to you guys it's ok to give him another shot. You are all hypocrites plain and simple. You guys all act like you care about the fighters safety but then when I actually point out some **** that makes sense you all turn your shoulder and act like it was ok. Your all full of **** and now I'm realizing why the real fans are starting to leave thise site.

[TOBYLEE1]

My point is that it was dirty but accepted. Because AA is from Germany he's getting **** on. I've hit guy like that in sparring **** happens when your an aggresive guy.

I see it more like AA was frustrated with Dirrell and went for it like Roy did to Griffin. His mindset was in hurting this guy cause he was behind. I like AA don't think he is a dirty fighter but he can get rough cause he can, he is a very strong fighter

[-Mustang-]

he wasn't on the ground .... difference ....

abraham hit him while he was on his knees .... after he slipped on water from abrahams corner ... Difference ....




try again donkey

[xAUGUSTUSx]

I see it more like AA was frustrated with Dirrell and went for it like Roy did to Griffin. His mindset was in hurting this guy cause he was behind. I like AA don't think he is a dirty fighter but he can get rough cause he can, he is a very strong fighter

Yea exactly! I just hate how everyone is bashing the guy like he's the worst thing to ever come to boxing. My point is that if he was a huge American superstar nobody would be making a big deal.

[TOBYLEE1]

I'm talking about the punch after they were down. It was clearly dirty. So just because the knee's were'nt down it's ok. One of Walcott's arms were slumped over the ropes and he was out cold but to you guys it's ok to give him another shot. You are all hypocrites plain and simple. You guys all act like you care about the fighters safety but then when I actually point out some **** that makes sense you all turn your shoulder and act like it was ok. Your all full of **** and now I'm realizing why the real fans are starting to leave thise site.

DQ was the right decision and AA is a pro and should know better. Act or no act in my eyes it was a foul. There are all kinds of fouls as you know it, but if the other guy is out it is a big deal and changes everything (rabbit punches, kidney punches, hitting and holding, etc)

[xAUGUSTUSx]

he wasn't on the ground .... difference ....

abraham hit him while he was on his knees .... after he slipped on water from abrahams corner ... Difference ....




try again donkey

I'm not trying **** you see what you want to see. I know what happened. My point is that the timing of the punch and the kind of punch is to a tee. What Marciano did was more dirty then what AA did. It was obvious that Walcott was out cold but with your mentality it was ok to hit him again. LOL hypocrite.

[sweetpea87]

The first punch was the one that knocked him out, and he didn't have a knee on the canvas. Dirrell slippped and had both kness on canvas then got hit.

[xAUGUSTUSx]

The first punch was the one that knocked him out, and he didn't have a knee on the canvas. Dirrell slippped and had both kness on canvas then got hit.

I know ****** but the timing of the punches when they were down was the same. If you can't see that then your clearly not all there. Rocky's punch was way more dirty then Abraham. walcott was clearly out cold. there is'nt anything dirtier then pounding a man who is out cold. Walcott was down because the ropes were holding him up while he was out cold with his face positioned straight down towards the floor. Another fight is Ray Mercer vs Tommy Morrison. Morrison took about 10 flush bombs while he was completely out and had his face turned the opposite way of the punches. But you hypocrites who just 3 days ago made such a big deal about Dirrells safety think that those KO's were ok? WOW you're ****ing fools seriously.

[STILL_DETOX]

hah i knew it was marciano

[Mr. Invincible]

I'm talking about the punch after they were down. It was clearly dirty. So just because the knee's were'nt down it's ok. One of Walcott's arms were slumped over the ropes and he was out cold but to you guys it's ok to give him another shot. You are all hypocrites plain and simple. You guys all act like you care about the fighters safety but then when I actually point out some **** that makes sense you all turn your shoulder and act like it was ok. Your all full of **** and now I'm realizing why the real fans are starting to leave thise site.

Nobody is saying it was okay, but it was way, way more acceptable that the Abraham shot. I'm not sure what you are looking at if you can't tell why the shots are totally different and why they are nothing alike as far as a foul goes.

First off, it was a punch that rendered Walcott in that condition and he wasn't all the way down when the second shot was thrown. On the other hand, Dirrell wasn't even hit while he slipped in the corner and was down on his knee and butt for a couple seconds before Abraham punched him blatantly because he was fustrated.

Completely different situations and you not knowing the difference is why the 'true fans' are leaving this site and not the other way around.

Thanks.