Do you believe Dirrell Should Be 2-0 In The Super Six?

[KickAzz]

Don't really care to discuss it. People think what they think at this point, and no one will change anyone's opinion. So just vote, and state something if you must.

I thought he beat Froch quite easily myself.

he got robbed in Nottingham. so yes... 2-0

[KickAzz]

No, its his fault he lost against Froch. He is by far a superior fighter to Froch, but he decided to run around and he didnt decisively win so its on him. AA was an undefeated fighter with some good wins and monstrous power and Dirrell spanked him like he was his daddy. He deserves to be 1-1, but talent wise he should be 2-0.

doesn't matter, he still beat froch no matter how ugly it was.

[P.WILL]

Yes, its pretty obvious he outlanded Carl Froch and made him look silly at times. People are blinded by Carl Froch's ineffective aggresion and tough guy style, sure Dirrell was hugging quite a bit but he won that boxing match. We all see how Dirrell handled the Queen so no controversy there. Dirrell should be in the p4p if he beats Ward.

[SirTomJones]

Of course, shamed Europe's best SMW within 2 fights

Not really, Froch beat him. Dirrell approach was shaming.

[AKATheMack]

doesn't matter, he still beat froch no matter how ugly it was.

Seeing as he lost a SD and looked horrible the whole fight its still his fault. If had looked half as good against Froch as he did against AA he would have won an easy UD. Whether the judges were wrong or not he still has himself to blame for not showing up to fight.

[BoxingFanFirst]

I think it's safe to say Dirrell was a totally new and improved fighter against AA.

He still beat Froch IMO. My dad hates Dirrell, and he even thought so.

[Dan...]

HELL NO.

First of all, Dirrell talks too much **** to be that much of a ***** in the ring.

Second of all, Froch beat his ass decisively. That's what Dirrell gets for running his ass around the ring instead of fighting.


Dirrell should have loss to AA but instead slipped and a freak accident happened. Dirrell should be 0-2 in the super 6 not 2-0.

LOL.

Don't score fights.

[-EX-]

Yes..........

[SirTomJones]

I think it's safe to say Dirrell was a totally new and improved fighter against AA.

He still beat Froch IMO. My dad hates Dirrell, and he even thought so.

A fight like Dirrell had against Froch can only benefit him.

Be interesting if Froch has improved.

[savorduhflavor]

The issue with people who usd the "Dirrell didn't deserve to win" argument are wasting their time. That Steward quote is a prime example.

Sure, I can see someone saying Dirrell fought ****** and was an eyesore to watch because of the way he was fighting, I'd agree.

But when scoring a fight, the most important criteria are clean punches landed. And Dirrell probably tripled the amount that Froch did.

So when looking at the fight as a whole, I get the point about how Dirrell fought. But that's not how you score fights...you score fights round by round, and Dirrell definitely won more rounds.