Do you believe Dirrell Should Be 2-0 In The Super Six?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • BoxingFanFirst
    Banned
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Feb 2010
    • 2191
    • 94
    • 7
    • 2,562

    #1

    Do you believe Dirrell Should Be 2-0 In The Super Six?

    Don't really care to discuss it. People think what they think at this point, and no one will change anyone's opinion. So just vote, and state something if you must.

    I thought he beat Froch quite easily myself.
    92
    Yes
    68.48%
    63
    No
    31.52%
    29
  • Porter's Dad
    Banned
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Dec 2007
    • 6831
    • 659
    • 84
    • 19,977

    #2
    It's a joke he's not.

    Comment

    • Steelhammer2011
      Banned
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Feb 2010
      • 2155
      • 293
      • 414
      • 2,338

      #3
      Dirrell should be 0-2.

      Froch won fair and square.

      Abraham clearly knocked him down in the 10th and then finished the retreating coward Dirrell in the 11th and made him cry like a little *****.

      Comment

      • F l i c k e r
        Il Principe
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Feb 2009
        • 20737
        • 1,323
        • 858
        • 83,771

        #4
        HELL NO.

        First of all, Dirrell talks too much **** to be that much of a ***** in the ring.

        Second of all, Froch beat his ass decisively. That's what Dirrell gets for running his ass around the ring instead of fighting.


        Dirrell should have loss to AA but instead slipped and a freak accident happened. Dirrell should be 0-2 in the super 6 not 2-0.

        Comment

        • savorduhflavor
          Undisputed Champion
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Oct 2008
          • 8194
          • 288
          • 59
          • 14,875

          #5
          Yea, I thought he beat Froch, close but clear. And he obviously beat Abraham.

          Comment

          • Flawless*
            Banned
            • Mar 2010
            • 3547
            • 279
            • 36
            • 4,484

            #6
            Of course, shamed Europe's best SMW within 2 fights

            Comment

            • Steelhammer2011
              Banned
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Feb 2010
              • 2155
              • 293
              • 414
              • 2,338

              #7
              Emanuel Steward said he thought Froch won the fight.

              "I saw the fight and I gave Froch the fight. Maybe Dirrell landed clean punches, but when he landed his punches he was finishing up by grabbing and not looking confident the way he should have. It’s the difference between boxing in a confident matter and the fact that he was letting Froch manhandle him. That was what I thought was the factor in the fight and even though a lot of people thought that it was a bad decision, if I would have been in Andre Dirrell’s corner I wouldn’t have complained. I thought he won the fight from clean blows but just the all around general boxing and mental and physical strength, Froch intimidated him. I thought the decision was fair but I don’t know how Froch is going to hold up with the rest of the guys. Just his mental mindset means that he’s a tough guy, because he’s going to always be up to it all the time because he has supreme confidence in himself. He may have more confidence than anyone in the entire tournament."

              Comment

              • B.U.R.N.E.R
                ~NSB Legend 2005-2015~
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Feb 2010
                • 30197
                • 1,346
                • 400
                • 47,475

                #8
                Originally posted by Steelhammer2010
                Emanuel Steward said he thought Froch won the fight.

                "I saw the fight and I gave Froch the fight. Maybe Dirrell landed clean punches, but when he landed his punches he was finishing up by grabbing and not looking confident the way he should have. It’s the difference between boxing in a confident matter and the fact that he was letting Froch manhandle him. That was what I thought was the factor in the fight and even though a lot of people thought that it was a bad decision, if I would have been in Andre Dirrell’s corner I wouldn’t have complained. I thought he won the fight from clean blows but just the all around general boxing and mental and physical strength, Froch intimidated him. I thought the decision was fair but I don’t know how Froch is going to hold up with the rest of the guys. Just his mental mindset means that he’s a tough guy, because he’s going to always be up to it all the time because he has supreme confidence in himself. He may have more confidence than anyone in the entire tournament."

                Who cares what he said. Froch won 3 rounds. Tops. And I actually like Froch.

                Comment

                • BoxingFanFirst
                  Banned
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Feb 2010
                  • 2191
                  • 94
                  • 7
                  • 2,562

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Steelhammer2010
                  Emanuel Steward said he thought Froch won the fight.

                  "I saw the fight and I gave Froch the fight. Maybe Dirrell landed clean punches, but when he landed his punches he was finishing up by grabbing and not looking confident the way he should have. It’s the difference between boxing in a confident matter and the fact that he was letting Froch manhandle him. That was what I thought was the factor in the fight and even though a lot of people thought that it was a bad decision, if I would have been in Andre Dirrell’s corner I wouldn’t have complained. I thought he won the fight from clean blows but just the all around general boxing and mental and physical strength, Froch intimidated him. I thought the decision was fair but I don’t know how Froch is going to hold up with the rest of the guys. Just his mental mindset means that he’s a tough guy, because he’s going to always be up to it all the time because he has supreme confidence in himself. He may have more confidence than anyone in the entire tournament."
                  What he said was he thought Dirrell won and landed the better blows, but wouldnt complain if he got the loss, from the wway he fought.

                  I didn't think Dirrell was as bad as people make it sound. Thats just me.

                  Comment

                  • AKATheMack
                    Unreasonably Logical
                    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                    • Nov 2004
                    • 11155
                    • 430
                    • 285
                    • 19,179

                    #10
                    No, its his fault he lost against Froch. He is by far a superior fighter to Froch, but he decided to run around and he didnt decisively win so its on him. AA was an undefeated fighter with some good wins and monstrous power and Dirrell spanked him like he was his daddy. He deserves to be 1-1, but talent wise he should be 2-0.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP