It's gotta be 2. It's not a KO. It's a decision made by the referee. Basically like deducting all of the DQed fighters points and ending the fight.
Or you could argue that it's like a cut caused by a punch and that counts as 3. Or you could argue that it's like a cut caused by a headbutt which counts as 2.
However you want to argue it I vote 2 points for the winner, -1 point for the DQed fighter.
It's gotta be 2. It's not a KO. It's a decision made by the referee. Basically like deducting all of the DQed fighters points and ending the fight.
Or you could argue that it's like a cut caused by a punch and that counts as 3. Or you could argue that it's like a cut caused by a headbutt which counts as 2.
However you want to argue it I vote 2 points for the winner, -1 point for the DQed fighter.
It's not that I want to argue for this or that. I just don't know the answer.
Originally posted by Spacey1991
He will get 2 I think... which means you could argue that Dirrell should have 4 point now.
Last part is difficult as the recordbooks state the Froch fight as a loss.
It's not that I want to argue for this or that. I just don't know the answer.
I don't mean argue in the internet sense, I mean it as in "debate" or "find reason for".
Overall I think you have to give the winner 2 points as it is not a knockout but a decision, and since this is a tournament fight the DQed fighter should be penalized and therefor lose 1 point.
Comment