I heard recently about a comment made my freddie roach if ever may and pac will clash. is this a rare thing in boxing? was there a match in the past which was done this way? because i think it would make fights way way more exciting knowing that a fighter will get nothing if he hits the canvass or gets schooled for 12 rds. what are your thoughts on this?
"Winner Takes all"
Collapse
-
-
It's never serious, and it would be ******ed for any fighter to ever take this deal from a business standpoint.
And a fight on this level, where there really isn't a clear favorite is too risky for either one to go for winner take all. -
Winner take all is unrealistic and would never be agreed to in all seriousness. No one would want to invest that much time and effort and possibly get nothing out of it. Although the purse will in all probability be set in negotiations, having the winner get the lion’s share of the purse, say 55% for decision, 60% for K.O. would be interesting. Also if both sides think they deserve the lions share and both sides actually feel confident, maybe it would be the easiest route, though it probably won't happen like that.Comment
-
It's something you might see in a Hollywood script, but it would never, ever really happen. Both guys will make at least 30 million.
People were discussing this over at ESB and some people were saying "why wouldn't it happen?" and "I think it could actually happen".

What world do some people live in?Comment
-
-
-
... No.
Could you imagine ODLH splitting 50/50 with Felix Sturm or something like that? Or how about Javier Castillejo?
Hell no all fights should not be 50/50. If you think a lot of good fights aren't made now because of money issues, that would be multipled by 1000. At least if someone is fighting someone who can't draw a crowd, they just get the bulk of the purse instead of fighting somebody worse for the same amount of money.Comment
-
Comment